2021
DOI: 10.5304/jafscd.2021.104.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"Not a new pattern": Black farmers' perspectives on barriers to participating in federal farm programs

Abstract: Although there are more opportunities and re­vamped avenues for socially disadvantaged farmers to participate in federal agricultural program since Pigford v. Glickman, the first Black farmer class action lawsuit against USDA and subsequent billion dollar settlement, there is not a lot of scholarly research on Black farmers’ perspectives and experiences in accessing and using these programs today. Using data from nine focus groups in Mississippi with 89 Black farmers, we find that Black farmers and ranchers id… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our BIPOC participants described stress from the legacies of white supremacy, which impacts their access to land, capital, and social networks. These experiences echo those of U.S. BIPOC farmers who encountered racial bias and discrimination when trying to participate in federal farm programs (Russell et al, 2021). Our study supplements research that suggests that women, LGBTQ+, and BIPOC farmers are not as supported by Cooperative Extension (Barbercheck et al, 2009) or government agencies (Ackoff et al, 2022; as cisgender white men.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Our BIPOC participants described stress from the legacies of white supremacy, which impacts their access to land, capital, and social networks. These experiences echo those of U.S. BIPOC farmers who encountered racial bias and discrimination when trying to participate in federal farm programs (Russell et al, 2021). Our study supplements research that suggests that women, LGBTQ+, and BIPOC farmers are not as supported by Cooperative Extension (Barbercheck et al, 2009) or government agencies (Ackoff et al, 2022; as cisgender white men.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Our BIPOC participants described stress from the legacies of white supremacy, which impacts their access to land, capital, and social networks. These experiences echo those of U.S. BIPOC farmers who encountered racial bias and discrimination when trying to participate in federal farm programs (Russell et al, 2021). Our study supplements research that suggests that women, LGBTQ+, and BIPOC farmers are not as supported by Cooperative Extension (Barbercheck et al, 2009) or government agencies (Ackoff et al, 2022;Wypler, 2019) as cisgender white men.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In other cases, land was stolen through outright fraud, like producing competing titles which deeded land to someone else. White farmers were given tax benefits, loans from banks, and other price supports from the government for their crops, which made them profitable, able to improve their land, and pay the requisite taxes [34]. These practices in the Reconstruction era in the South after the Civil War, along with outright patterns of intimidating Black farmers and the existence of a culture of violence against them, contributed to the significant loss of African American farmland in the United States [5,14].…”
Section: Heirs Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%