2011
DOI: 10.1348/147608310x514523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Not a neutral event’: Clinical psychologists' experiences of gifts in therapeutic relationships

Abstract: The findings suggested that many participants viewed the gift as a way of the client reciprocating something that was given in the therapy. Within a Maussian account, this notion of reciprocity positions the therapeutic contact as the 'first gift'. Few gifts were refused and frequently occasioned pleasure in the participants. Although some givers were understood as needing to give because of ascribed intra-individual characteristics or 'psychopathology', normative gifting practices were commonly held to apply … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To follow Bailey and Burch’s lead would be to suggest extending 1.06(d) whereby we cannot converse about nonservice topics, such as the weather or how one is feeling that day, unless that conversation has immediate relevance to the client’s success. However, we would rather see the field pursue commonsense practices in accepting and giving gifts, but this will require us to first undertake an operational definition of gifts, 5 as it remains unclear what might constitute a gift (see Willingham & Boyle, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To follow Bailey and Burch’s lead would be to suggest extending 1.06(d) whereby we cannot converse about nonservice topics, such as the weather or how one is feeling that day, unless that conversation has immediate relevance to the client’s success. However, we would rather see the field pursue commonsense practices in accepting and giving gifts, but this will require us to first undertake an operational definition of gifts, 5 as it remains unclear what might constitute a gift (see Willingham & Boyle, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%