1982
DOI: 10.1017/s0195941700055892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nosocomial Infection Control and the Smaller Hospital—What Do We Know, What Do We Do?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Since that study no substantial nor systematic review of nosocomial infections in small community or rural hospitals has been reported. A recent editorial in Infection Control 3 posed four questions that still needed to be answered for the smaller (less than 100-bed) hospital: 1. Given the statistical realities of small hospitals, what types of surveillance methods-periodic prevalence surveys, general surveillance, focused surveillance, etc.-are the most reliable?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Since that study no substantial nor systematic review of nosocomial infections in small community or rural hospitals has been reported. A recent editorial in Infection Control 3 posed four questions that still needed to be answered for the smaller (less than 100-bed) hospital: 1. Given the statistical realities of small hospitals, what types of surveillance methods-periodic prevalence surveys, general surveillance, focused surveillance, etc.-are the most reliable?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%