2009
DOI: 10.1080/19331680903041845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Norwegian Parties and Web 2.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
53
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the black line (representing Twitter activity) with its gray counterpart (denoting Instagram activity), the relative dominance of the former over the latter must be said to have been expected as Twitter has been featured in Norwegian politics since at least the 2009 national elections (Kalnes, 2009). Beyond volume of use, the shapes of the lines provide us with more detailed insights.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing the black line (representing Twitter activity) with its gray counterpart (denoting Instagram activity), the relative dominance of the former over the latter must be said to have been expected as Twitter has been featured in Norwegian politics since at least the 2009 national elections (Kalnes, 2009). Beyond volume of use, the shapes of the lines provide us with more detailed insights.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Norway, often understood as one of the Nordic welfare states (Hilson, 2008), features a party-centered political system (Karlsen, 2010) and advanced Internet users (Vaage, 2014) where social media have been used by political parties for a comparably long time (Kalnes, 2009). As such, the Norwegian context appears as a suitable one in which to analyze recent developments regarding the services under scrutiny.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Según la primera, precisamente las tecnologías son las que determinan las peculiaridades de los procesos sociales, políticos y demás que marcan la vida de la sociedad moderna (Stromer-Galley 2000: 113;Foot and Schneider, 2006;Vaccari, 2008aVaccari, , 2008bVaccari, , 2008cPepe & di Gennaro, 2009; entre otros). Los defensores del segundo punto de vista existente afirman que el uso de las redes sociales no influye en la eficacia y la calidad de la comunicación social y política y por ello no puede marcar la vida de la sociedad moderna (Margolis et al 2003;Chong and Druckman, 2007;Kifer, Parkin, 2007;Larsson, 2011;Gibson et al 2008;Zittel, 2009;Kalnes, 2009, entre otros).…”
Section: Figura 1 Distribución Del Contenido En Las Redes Socialesunclassified
“…Interaction and discussion on Twitter in the Spanish elections of May 2015May 4 et al, 2010Kalnes, 2009) se transita por una normalización de las estrategias de campaña en la red (Golbeck, Grimes, & Rogers, 2010;Jackson & Lilleker, 2011;Larsson & Moe, 2012;López et al, 2015;Small, 2010). En España, la infrautilización de las herramientas participativas de estos escenarios virtuales ha marcado la mayoría de sus usos electorales (Chavero, 2013;Guadián, 2011;Mancera & Pano, 2013;Zamora & Zurutuza, 2014;Zugasti & Pérez, 2015).…”
Section: Interacción Y Debate En Twitter En Las Elecciones Españolas unclassified