Populist Political Communication in Europe
DOI: 10.4324/9781315623016-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Norway: Populism From Anti-Tax Movement to Government Party

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistically, Romania—which overthrew its communist regime in December 1989—is the most religious country of the European Union (EU) with 89.9% Orthodox Christians and 1% non-believers [ 3 , 4 ]. If at the institutional level of the EU, the border, which followed the limits of the national territory of the Romanian State, had to quickly submit to the technical requirements of adapting to the new configuration, the sociocultural symbolic borders are still the site of a very fruitful unfinished socio-political reorganization, a reorganization which draws on the traditional cultural background of Orthodox Christianity focusing on national identity [ 5 , 6 ] and the old programming ideology of the new power inclined to transmute communism into populism in favor of a political opportunism now perceived by the population as a process of democratization [ 2 , 7 , 8 ]. The emerging media and especially social media, with Facebook as a priority, are a prolific communicational embodiment of the return to borders, of the nationalism of Orthodox Christian origin and of post-communist populism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistically, Romania—which overthrew its communist regime in December 1989—is the most religious country of the European Union (EU) with 89.9% Orthodox Christians and 1% non-believers [ 3 , 4 ]. If at the institutional level of the EU, the border, which followed the limits of the national territory of the Romanian State, had to quickly submit to the technical requirements of adapting to the new configuration, the sociocultural symbolic borders are still the site of a very fruitful unfinished socio-political reorganization, a reorganization which draws on the traditional cultural background of Orthodox Christianity focusing on national identity [ 5 , 6 ] and the old programming ideology of the new power inclined to transmute communism into populism in favor of a political opportunism now perceived by the population as a process of democratization [ 2 , 7 , 8 ]. The emerging media and especially social media, with Facebook as a priority, are a prolific communicational embodiment of the return to borders, of the nationalism of Orthodox Christian origin and of post-communist populism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the United States is marked by increasing hostility across party lines (Iyengar et al, 2012), and according to Putnam (2000), with a decline in social capital, the Nordic countries enjoy comparatively high levels of social capital and political trust (Fukuyama, 2014), and are characterized by high socio-cultural homogeneity. Norway has traditions of cross-party compromise and consensus-oriented politics (Knutsen, 2017), and also has a comparatively non-aggressive branch of right-wing populism integrated in the party system (Jupskås et al, 2017). On the contrary, the United States stands in a position of power with regard to Norway, wielding cultural influence, close political ties (e.g.…”
Section: The Case Of Norway Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, populists call into question the governing "establishment" and the norm of contributing to public discussions in a restrained and politically appropriate fashion. So far, research has analyzed populist party leaders' behavior (van der Brug & Mughan, 2007;McDonnell, 2016), party manifestos (March, 2017;Pauwels, 2011;Rooduijn & Pauwels, 2011), and communication strategies (Aalberg, 2017;Jagers & Walgrave, 2007). In light of growing public support for populist parties in Europe and beyond, research has furthermore highlighted the role of sociodemographic factors (Oesch, 2008) as well as political and populist attitudes in populist voting (Akkerman et al, 2017;Andreadis & Stavrakakis, 2017;Loew & Faas, 2019;Rama & Santana, 2020;Rooduijn, 2018;Wuttke et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%