2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11001-020-09399-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Northern segment of the North Anatolian Fault in the Gulf of Izmit inferred from marine magnetic anomalies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The description of the whole active fault system in and around Lake Iznik also improves tectonic knowledge. The Gürle and Orhangazi normal faults bounded the underwater Iznik and South Boyalıca faults, resulting in a negative flower structure linked to the MNAF system, as shown on the simplified NS cross section of the lake (Demirel et al, 2020; Figure 10b). Lake Iznik exhibits three sub‐basins that cannot be explained in a simple pull‐apart process approach (Dooley & Schreurs, 2012; Wu et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The description of the whole active fault system in and around Lake Iznik also improves tectonic knowledge. The Gürle and Orhangazi normal faults bounded the underwater Iznik and South Boyalıca faults, resulting in a negative flower structure linked to the MNAF system, as shown on the simplified NS cross section of the lake (Demirel et al, 2020; Figure 10b). Lake Iznik exhibits three sub‐basins that cannot be explained in a simple pull‐apart process approach (Dooley & Schreurs, 2012; Wu et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gürle and Orhangazi normal faults bounded the underwater Iznik and South Boyalıca faults, resulting in a negative flower structure linked to the MNAF system, as shown on the simplified NS cross section of the lake (Demirel et al, 2020;Fig. 10b).…”
Section: Regional Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, geophysical surveys can give additional evidences [Barberi et al, 2004;Schrott and Sass, 2008;Blaikie et al, 2014], and among them, the magnetic investigation has been widely and efficaciously used in detecting concealed and subsurface volcano-tectonic structures. The interpretation of magnetization contrasts, appropriately integrated with the available geophysical and geological knowledge of the investigated area, has provided valid information on the relationships between the various volcanic and/or tectonic structures both at local and regional level worldwide [Finn and Morgan, 2002;Blanco-Montenegro et al, 2003;Napoli et al, 2007;Napoli and Currenti, 2016;Caratori Tontini, 2016;Demirel et al, 2020;Yan et al, 2018]. In volcanic areas, indeed, the strong magnetization contrasts generated by the presence of rocks with different magnetic properties (susceptibility, induced and remanent magnetization) make this method and the related anomaly maps an efficient tool to identify, delineate, and estimate the depth of the subsurface complex structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%