2010
DOI: 10.1215/00031283-2010-009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Northern Cities Mexican American English: Vowel Production and Perception

Abstract: This article investigates the influence of the Northern Cities Shift (NCS) on the production and perception of English vowels by Mexican Americans in Lansing, Michigan. Findings indicate full accommodation to local mainstream norms with respect to all NCS vowels except /æ/, which displays unique patterning both prenasally and in other environments. The evidence also reveals that young women in Lansing, both Anglo and Mexican American, have adopted more advanced stages of the NCS than men in their pronunciation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 4. This vigorous expansion of the nasal system in Lansing was reported in an earlier study of 12 female speakers in that city by Roeder (2010). …”
Section: Notessupporting
confidence: 79%
“… 4. This vigorous expansion of the nasal system in Lansing was reported in an earlier study of 12 female speakers in that city by Roeder (2010). …”
Section: Notessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…They found that listeners with greater degrees of /eɪ/ centralization in their own speech classified more central stimuli as /eɪ/ than nonshifted listeners did (see also Fridland & Kendall, 2012; Kendall & Fridland, 2012). This is one of the clearest demonstrations of an association between production and perception in ongoing vowel shifts; it supports the view, voiced by Roeder (2010:179), that “individuals have a more difficult time understanding pronunciations that they themselves do not use, even if those pronunciations reflect standard local norms.”…”
Section: Perception Studysupporting
confidence: 76%
“…These "simplified" structures are also less marked, in linguistic terms, and are typical of child speech (Fabiano-Smith & Barlow, 2010). As far as the available evidence suggests, heritage speaker speech does not demonstrate this quality (Chang, Yao, Haynes, & Rhodes, 2011;Henriksen, 2015;Kim, 2015;Rao & Ronquest, 2015;Roeder, 2010;Ronquest, 2012, among others). Heritage speaker speech does, however, seem to exhibit crosslinguistic influence from the dominant language into the heritage language and from the heritage language into the dominant language.…”
Section: Dominance and Proficiency In Heritage Speaker Speechmentioning
confidence: 99%