2015
DOI: 10.1175/jcli-d-14-00525.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

North Atlantic Eddy-Driven Jet in Interglacial and Glacial Winter Climates

Abstract: The atmospheric westerly flow in the North Atlantic (NA) sector is dominated by atmospheric waves or eddies generating via momentum flux convergence, the so-called eddy-driven jet. The position of this jet is variable and shows for the present-day winter climate three preferred latitudinal states: a northern, central, and southern position in the NA. Here, the authors analyze the behavior of the eddy-driven jet under different glacial and interglacial boundary conditions using atmosphere-land-only simulations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

18
93
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
18
93
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The enhanced frequency of E CWTs during LGM can be attributed to the changed boundary conditions (e.g., modified Fennoscandian ice sheet) and the resulting glacial anticyclone. The enhanced frequency of S and C CWT during LGM can be attributed to the southward displacement of both the jet stream [ Merz et al , ] and storm track, and a split of the storm track over the Adriatic Sea, with one branch located north and east of the Alps [see Florineth and Schlüchter , , Figure 6]. Likewise, cyclones are apparently constrained to move along the southern flank of the Fennoscandian ice sheet, which effectively blocks their passage northeastward.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The enhanced frequency of E CWTs during LGM can be attributed to the changed boundary conditions (e.g., modified Fennoscandian ice sheet) and the resulting glacial anticyclone. The enhanced frequency of S and C CWT during LGM can be attributed to the southward displacement of both the jet stream [ Merz et al , ] and storm track, and a split of the storm track over the Adriatic Sea, with one branch located north and east of the Alps [see Florineth and Schlüchter , , Figure 6]. Likewise, cyclones are apparently constrained to move along the southern flank of the Fennoscandian ice sheet, which effectively blocks their passage northeastward.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…From sensitivity experiments using the AGCM and the OGCM, this intensification of the wind is attributed to the topography effect of the glacial ice sheets, especially that of the North American ice sheet, which is consistent with previous atmospheric studies (e.g. Cook and Held 1988;Li and Battisti 2008;Ullman et al 2014;Löfverström et al 2014;Merz et al 2015). Our decoupled simulations also show that the strengthening of the atmospheric cyclonic circulation over the Greenland-IcelandNorwegian Seas can have a large impact on the AMOC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, other factors, such as surface cooling over the ice sheet, also play an important role (Cook and Held 1988;Ringler and Cook 1999;Liakka 2012;Löfverström et al 2014). Associated with the stationary wave field, the westerlies also intensify throughout the troposphere in the North Atlantic (Li and Battisti 2008;Merz et al 2015).…”
Section: Results From the Agcmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is observed in midlatitude jets around the world using two very different jet identification methods and is exhibited across the model hierarchy from stateof-the-art climate models down to a zonally symmetric barotropic model. Although not examined here, this relationship is also consistent with the transition to a stronger, more stable North Atlantic jet during the Last Glacial Maximum (Li and Battisti 2008;Rivière et al 2010;Merz et al 2015). An additional potential application of this work is to understanding climate model biases; our results suggest that a mean state bias in jet strength could impact the jet variability in the model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%