2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2525-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

North Atlantic climate far more predictable than models imply

Abstract: Quantifying signals and uncertainties in climate models is essential for climate change detection, attribution, prediction and projection [1][2][3] . Although inter-model agreement is high for large-scale temperature signals, dynamical changes in atmospheric circulation are very uncertain 4 , leading to low confidence in regional projections especially for precipitation over the coming decades 5, 6 . Furthermore, model simulations with tiny differences in initial conditions suggest that uncertainties may be l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
225
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
18
225
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By not resolving a possible sustained increase in future Greenland blocking events and associated atmospheric circulation changes, CMIP6 (and previous CMIP5) ESM‐based projections could therefore underestimate Greenland ice sheet surface melt if the observed recent circulation anomalies persist over subsequent decades. Major uncertainties concerning the global understanding of the processes producing these blocking events currently preclude reliable simulation of their occurrence by climate models (Woollings et al ., 2018; Smith et al ., 2020). Therefore, future ESM developments should focus on representing such changes in atmospheric circulation in order to reduce the uncertainty in: (1) projections of Greenland ice sheet contribution to global sea level rise; and (2) possible downstream effects of Greenland blocking on the North Atlantic polar jet stream and accompanying extreme weather conditions over Northwest Europe (Hanna et al ., 2018b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By not resolving a possible sustained increase in future Greenland blocking events and associated atmospheric circulation changes, CMIP6 (and previous CMIP5) ESM‐based projections could therefore underestimate Greenland ice sheet surface melt if the observed recent circulation anomalies persist over subsequent decades. Major uncertainties concerning the global understanding of the processes producing these blocking events currently preclude reliable simulation of their occurrence by climate models (Woollings et al ., 2018; Smith et al ., 2020). Therefore, future ESM developments should focus on representing such changes in atmospheric circulation in order to reduce the uncertainty in: (1) projections of Greenland ice sheet contribution to global sea level rise; and (2) possible downstream effects of Greenland blocking on the North Atlantic polar jet stream and accompanying extreme weather conditions over Northwest Europe (Hanna et al ., 2018b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As winter is the most important season for groundwater recharge in Europe, the ability to accurately forecast winter streamflow would be extremely beneficial for water managers. Advances in predicting the NAO (Scaife et al, 2014;Smith et al, 2020) enable long-range forecasts of UK winter hydrology (Svensson et al, 2015) as well as improved seasonal meteorological forecasts for driving hydrological models (Stringer et al, 2020). Hence, it may be possible to leverage this predictability to improve ESP performance by sub-sampling ensemble members for Ireland using the winter NAO.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, climate models also show a spuriously low ratio of predictable signal strength to internal noise variability. This means that newfound decadal prediction skill can only be realized by averaging large ensembles of hundreds of simulations and it could affect the attribution and prediction of quantitative changes in extratropical climate using current models (Scaife & Smith, 2018; Smith et al, 2020).…”
Section: New Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%