Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace 2010
DOI: 10.1201/ebk1439804896-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

North American Perspectives on Hostile Behaviors and Bullying at Work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Reflecting (broadly) the national demographic profile of the teaching profession (Drudy, 2009), there was a gender split of 20:4, female to male. Given the ongoing debate regarding definitions of workplace bullying (Keashly & Jagatic, 2011), no excluding criteria were applied, except that participants considered that they had been the targets of ongoing campaigns of bullying and harassment in their respective schools. A semi-structured interview framework was employed, thus allowing for, and encouraging, interviewees to be fully participative in the interview process (Elliott, 2005), raising issues that were considered to be pertinent (Dawson, 2009) and, as observed by Davies and Gannon (2006), giving clues as to their subjective view of the world.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflecting (broadly) the national demographic profile of the teaching profession (Drudy, 2009), there was a gender split of 20:4, female to male. Given the ongoing debate regarding definitions of workplace bullying (Keashly & Jagatic, 2011), no excluding criteria were applied, except that participants considered that they had been the targets of ongoing campaigns of bullying and harassment in their respective schools. A semi-structured interview framework was employed, thus allowing for, and encouraging, interviewees to be fully participative in the interview process (Elliott, 2005), raising issues that were considered to be pertinent (Dawson, 2009) and, as observed by Davies and Gannon (2006), giving clues as to their subjective view of the world.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Ijime has been related to research on bullying in school-aged, whereas other specific problems related to death or suicide due to overwork such as Karōshi and Karōjisatsu have been traditionally explored in organizational settings in Japan and other Asian countries 17) . Regarding the US, bullying is related to other terms such as generalized workplace abuse/harassment, emotional abuse, or interpersonal mistreatment at workplace (for a review, see 18) ). Finally, the concepts of bullying (which implies individual acts of harassment directed towards another individual) and mobbing (which implies abusive behavior from a group to an individual) have been used in several European countries (e.g., 19) ).…”
Section: Workplace Bullying Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a social interactionist perspective, bystanders are actors in the process of workplace mobbing (Namie & Lutgen-Sandvik, 2010), although their role in this process is still unclear (Keashly & Jagatic, 2011). Bystanders can take various positions in the mobbing process, ranging from helping the bully to helping the victim (Paull et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%