North American Dental Students’ Perspectives About Their Clinical Education

Abstract

Many North American dental schools face the challenge of replacing the majority of their "boomer generation" clinical instructors over the next ten years as this cohort of faculty reaches retirement age. Developing a new cadre of clinical instructors poses a substantial faculty development challenge: what instructional techniques should be integrated into routine educational practice by the dental faculty of the future, and what aspects of the clinical learning environment should be addressed to improve the overall quality of the experience for patients, students, and the new cohort of instructors? To gain insight that might guide faculty development for new clinical instructors and enhance understanding of the learning environment in dental school clinics, this study addressed the following question: what are dental students' perceptions of their learning experiences in the clinical setting? The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the clinical instruction from the perspectives of the actual "consumer" of dental education: the student. This consumers' perspective was provided by 655 junior, senior, and graduate dental students at twenty-one North American dental schools who completed the Clinical Education Instructional Quality Questionnaire (ClinEd IQ) in 2003-04. The ClinED IQ examines four components of students' clinical experiences: 1) clinical learning opportunities, 2) involvement in specific learning activities, 3) interaction with clinical instructors, and 4) personal perceptions about clinical education. With the exception of inconsistent feedback and instruction and lack of continuous contact with the same instructors, juniors, seniors, and graduate students rated their interaction with clinical instructors favorably (mean=4.76 on a 6.00 scale), but provided lower ratings for clinical learning opportunities (mean=4.26 on a 6.00 scale) due to concerns about the efficiency of the dental clinic environment and lack of opportunity to treat patients in a variety of clinical settings. Analysis of more than 1,000 written comments provided by these students indicated four areas of concern: 1) inconsistent and sometimes insensitive (patronizing, rude) feedback from faculty; 2) excessive amounts of noneducational "legwork" such as billing, patient scheduling, phone calling, completing paperwork, and performing other clinic operations tasks; 3) limited access to faculty because of insufficient numbers of instructors on the clinic floor or difficulty locating faculty when they were needed for coaching, work evaluation, and chart signatures; and 4) concerns about the strategies employed to meet procedural requirements that some students saw as ethically questionable. Junior, senior, and graduate dental students at twenty-one North American dental schools perceived that the strongest aspect of their clinical education was their relationship with the faculty, but also reported that the dental school clinic was often an inefficient learning environment that hindered their opportunity to develop c...

Learning experiences of oral hygiene students in the clinical environment

“…It may also explain the apparent contradictions in student experiences of feedback. Students in this study were able to reflect on and articulate the expected behaviours and what they would need to hear from supervisors to support their learning in the clinical environment, and these were consistent with the literature .…”

“…During patient treatment sessions, the clinical teacher occupies the multiple roles of a teacher, a clinical supervisor responsible for the safety of the patient, and of an expert clinician, and is expected to continuously switch between these roles. It has been documented that the behaviour and the approach of clinical teachers may enhance or detract from the learning experience of students .…”

“…The clinical learning experiences of medical , dental , nursing and to a lesser extent dental hygiene students are well documented. Effective learning experiences of dental students have been related to instructor characteristics, characteristics of the learning experience and the learning environment .…”

A city‐wide survey of dental students’ opinions on undergraduate oral surgery teaching

“…We assessed the students' dominance on oral surgical procedures through their confidence levels. It should be considered that confidence level is a subjective measurement that cannot reflect the actual ability or skill of an individual . Stacey MA et al reported that undergraduates gained significantly higher scores regarding clinical competency from their assessments as compared to lecturers’ assessments .…”

Thinking ecologically about clinical education in dentistry

“…For example, in the patient‐centred approach, what is best for patients becomes the central focus . Research shows that traditional approaches do not properly respond to the interplay of needs and interests of the stakeholders involved in CE . For instance, Dehghan et al found that whilst students valued the opportunity to provide more comprehensive care under the group practice system, they were concerned about not being exposed to the experiences of instructors and students outside of their group, which they recognised as an advantage of the student‐centred, discipline‐based system .…”