2012
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1282004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normwerte in der Abdomensonografie - Aorta, Vena cava inferior, Niere

Abstract: Normal values are helpful in delimiting numerous pathological changes in the respective organs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Renal length and cortical thickness have been studied extensively in animals and their parameters are well documented [ 8 , 9 ]. In humans, however, there have been only a few studies actually designed to measure these parameters in adults who do not have renal disease [ 10 , 11 ]. Unfortunately, in previous studies, some of the adults included had diseases such as diabetes and hypertension that could affect the kidneys [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renal length and cortical thickness have been studied extensively in animals and their parameters are well documented [ 8 , 9 ]. In humans, however, there have been only a few studies actually designed to measure these parameters in adults who do not have renal disease [ 10 , 11 ]. Unfortunately, in previous studies, some of the adults included had diseases such as diabetes and hypertension that could affect the kidneys [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…der zentrale Venendruck grob abgeschätzt werden. Abhängig von Messort und Position des Patienten kann der Durchmesser bei Gesunden wenige Millimeter bis 27 mm betragen [18]. Im Mittel findet sich ein Durchmesser der VCI von 14 mm und ein inspiratorischer Kollaps bei normaler Atmung von 35 % [19].…”
Section: Apparative Diagnostikunclassified
“…However, the diagnostic value of conventional ultrasound is highly operator-dependent. Moreover, the documentation of ultrasound examinations is traditionally performed in poorly standardized two-dimensional images [24]. This neither permits a retrospective review of the entire examination nor allows a sufficient comparison with radiological imaging (computed tomography, CT; magnetic resonance imaging, MRI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%