2010
DOI: 10.1037/a0020593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Norms and screening utility of the Dutch version of the Children's Depression Inventory in clinical and nonclinical youths.

Abstract: This study aimed to (1) assess relationships between the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) and DSM-oriented depression and anxiety scales of the Youth Self Report (YSR); (2) develop reliable norms for the CDI; and (3) determine CDI cutoff scores for selecting youngsters at risk for depression and anxiety. A total of 3073 non-clinical and 511 clinically referred children and adolescents from The Netherlands and Belgium were included. Results showed that CDI scores were significantly related to both DSM-orie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, as the study was conducted in a general population sample, it might be difficult to generalize the results to clinical samples. However, the mean of depressive symptoms and the percentage of children displaying (sub)clinical levels of depressive symptoms were in line with the prevalence rates that are on average found in general population samples of this age-group (Roelofs et al, 2010;Twenge & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2002). Thus, although no inferences can be made for clinical samples, the current sample seems appropriate to answer our research question about the general population.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…First, as the study was conducted in a general population sample, it might be difficult to generalize the results to clinical samples. However, the mean of depressive symptoms and the percentage of children displaying (sub)clinical levels of depressive symptoms were in line with the prevalence rates that are on average found in general population samples of this age-group (Roelofs et al, 2010;Twenge & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2002). Thus, although no inferences can be made for clinical samples, the current sample seems appropriate to answer our research question about the general population.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The relatively few studies on the topic are are from non-clinical settings where the rate of depression and mental health problems are not as high as they are in clinical settings (Roelofs et al, 2010). A study by Hay and Meldrum (2010) examined the effect of bullying victimization on adolescent NSSI behavior using data on 426 students from selected schools in Southeastern US.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pilot data of Matzner (1994) indicated excellent inter-rater reliability for the disruptive behaviour module (.84 for oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder and 1.0 for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder). In a Belgian sample Cohen's Kappa ranged from .79 to 1.0, suggesting excellent agreement (Roelofs et al, 2010).…”
Section: Structured Clinical Interview For Dsm-iv Child Edition (Kid-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now two Dutch studies [15,41] investigated the quality of the Dutch version of the CDI. In both studies a cut-off score of 16 maximised the specificity and sensitivity of the CDI and resulted in a total predictive value (percentage of cases correctly classified in depressed versus non-depressed) between 86.3% (Timbremont et al, 2004) and 93.23% (Roelofs, et al, 2010).…”
Section: Structured Clinical Interview For Dsm-iv Child Edition (Kid-mentioning
confidence: 99%