2018
DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_91_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normative Ulnar Nerve Conduction Study: Comparison of Two Measurement Methods

Abstract: Background:Given the high prevalence rate of ulnar neuropathy and importance of its proper management, to have a baseline information about the normative value of motor nerve conduction of first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle and abductor digiti minimi muscle (ADM) and their differences as well as their relation with different demographic characteristics of our population, we aimed to determine and compare the mean value of motor conduction velocity of FDI and ADM at forearm and across the elbow among the no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, in this study, the early screening of ulnar nerve entrapment among cell phone users was planned. The mean motor conduction velocity recorded in this study among cell phone users was around 56 ± 4.9 m/second, which was lower than the normative data reported by Haghighat et al (2018) [ 12 ]. Prolonged latency (>4 seconds for both S1 and S2) and the lowered conduction velocity of the ulnar nerve indicate nerve compression.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…So, in this study, the early screening of ulnar nerve entrapment among cell phone users was planned. The mean motor conduction velocity recorded in this study among cell phone users was around 56 ± 4.9 m/second, which was lower than the normative data reported by Haghighat et al (2018) [ 12 ]. Prolonged latency (>4 seconds for both S1 and S2) and the lowered conduction velocity of the ulnar nerve indicate nerve compression.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%