Normative Reflexions on Constructivist Approaches to Science and Technology

Abstract

Systematic and fundamental thinking on normative, or normatively relevant, questions is virtually absent in the highly influential constructivist studies of science and technology. This paper is an attempt at changing this situation. After reviewing and assessing the role of normativity and reflexivity, in so far as it has been acknowledged within constructivism, a number of `normative reflexions' are presented. Three general approaches—social constructivism, ethnography and actor-network theory—are analyzed in detail. The main themes of these analytical and critical reflexions are: `missing issues', `locality', `relativism', `the winner's perspective', and `technoscientific success'. It turns out that constructivist views concerning these themes have a number of normatively questionable consequences. These consequences can be avoided if certain constructivist assumptions, which are empirically unwarranted or unnecessary anyway, are rejected. Instead, some constructive alternatives are proposed for a social study of science and technology that is both empirically adequate and normatively satisfactory.

Where are the politics in responsible innovation? European governance, technology assessments, and beyond

“…In fact, a longstanding criticism of such 68 M. van Oudheusden approaches is that although they concern themselves with political and normative issues in science and technology, and despite their understanding that science is not a neutral, disinterested enterprise, they fail to critically engage with their own norms and politics (Radder 1992;Fuller 2000;Genus 2006;Pestre 2008). With a few notable exceptions (e.g.…”

Social medicine and sociology: the productiveness of antagonisms arising from maintaining disciplinary boundaries

“…Notes 7 This exploration is inspired by the work of Stengers (1997Stengers ( , 2000Stengers ( , 2003 whose work traces the ongoing 'invention' of the sciences and explains that the process of inventing science necessitates a productive tension between 'objectivity' and 'belief'. 8 Both Radder (1992) and Fraser (2006) raise cautions about the ethical overtones of Latour's approach to knowledge production. 9 Such is the aim of Latour (2005) and is discussed in Barry and Born (2013).…”

Making sense of ICT, new media, and ethics

“…In these historical accounts the analysts remain agnostic about the knowledge claims and often implicit value judgements made by the diVerent relevant social actors (this is often referred to as methodological symmetry or as methodological relativism). 4 Indeed constructivist studies, based on methodological symmetry, are often criticized for not 'taking a stand' and getting caught up in a moral relativism (Winner 1993;Radder 1992). Wiebe Bijker, a prominent Wgure in the STS community, suggested that 'The STS agenda has been largely agnostic as to the normative and political issues related to the application of STS insights (Bijker 2003: 445).…”