Normative Data for an Instrumental Assessment of the Upper-Limb Functionality

Abstract

Upper-limb movement analysis is important to monitor objectively rehabilitation interventions, contributing to improving the overall treatments outcomes. Simple, fast, easy-to-use, and applicable methods are required to allow routinely functional evaluation of patients with different pathologies and clinical conditions. This paper describes the Reaching and Hand-to-Mouth Evaluation Method, a fast procedure to assess the upper-limb motor control and functional ability, providing a set of normative data from 42 healthy subjects of different ages, evaluated for both the dominant and the nondominant limb motor performance. Sixteen of them were reevaluated after two weeks to perform test-retest reliability analysis. Data were clustered into three subgroups of different ages to test the method sensitivity to motor control differences. Experimental data show notable test-retest reliability in all tasks. Data from older and younger subjects show significant differences in the measures related to the ability for coordination thus showing the high sensitivity of the method to motor control differences. The presented method, provided with control data from healthy subjects, appears to be a suitable and reliable tool for the upper-limb functional assessment in the clinical environment.

Predicting Functional Recovery in Chronic Stroke Rehabilitation Using Event-Related Desynchronization-Synchronization during Robot-Assisted Movement

“…A paradigmatic upper-limb functional gesture, namely, the Hand-to-Mouth Movement (HtMM, see Figure 2 ) [ 11 ], was chosen for EEG evaluation. The HtMM-motion laws (path and velocity) of the active (no-assisted) movements performed by each subject were acquired using the 3D-motion capture system and the procedure described in Caimmi et al 2012 [ 10 ].…”

Exoskeleton and End‐Effector Robots for Upper and Lower Limbs Rehabilitation: Narrative Review

“…The shoulder is deputized to the orientation of the upper limb into the space; the elbow and the wrist are important for turning away/approaching objects from/to the subject's body, and the hand is necessary to grasp and manipulate objects. Hundreds of different strategies can be used to perform the same goal‐directed movement because the upper limb is a kinematically redundant multijoint system with multiple degrees of freedom [2]. The choice of the direction of the movement to be performed should be taken into the highest consideration, approaching or moving away from the body, toward an object, or toward a definite part of patient's own body.…”

Optical Enhancement of Exoskeleton-Based Estimation of Glenohumeral Angles

“…Reference [ 26 ] reports a five-marker installation procedure. This reference explicitly mentions five markers as an acceptable number for clinical upper limb tracking.…”

“…In this paper, we report the usage of two markers for upper arm tracking. It is not possible to compare the performance of the marker placement protocol proposed here with the one in [ 26 ] because the work in [ 26 ] addresses (a) non-RAR scenarios, (b) tracking of the entire upper limb, and (c) protocol sensitivity w.r.t. its application on the dominant/nondominant arm and w.r.t.…”