Normative and Positive Social Work in the Context of the Placement Decision: A Defence of Social Workers

Abstract

Two fundamental questions for social work are considered: one normative and one positive. First, is it possible for social work practice to be based on an objective that maximises social welfare; and second, does social work practice actually conform to some objective, which may or may not maximise social welfare? To shed light on these issues for social work we analyse them from the perspective of economics, in the context of one of the most important decisions involving social workers -placing children in out-of-home care. It is argued that deriving a societal objective faces formidable theoretical problems, and that even if a well-defined criterion was available, actual social work recommendations would still be inconsistent due to a lack of the requisite information and different interpretations of the available data. It is argued that the substantial empirical evidence from around the world on placing children out-of-home provides little evidence of consistent decision making. This may be because the statistical analyses have lacked the data and techniques necessary to detect the underlying patterns, or because placement decisions are largely random.The apparent absence of clear objectives, either specified by society or accepted custom and practice, places social workers in a very difficult position, making them open to press criticism and victimization, even though they acted entirely competently.

A critique of virtual court for intimate partner abuse victims in child welfare cases: Another layer of disadvantage for female victims?

“…The dominos fell with the randomness of the selection of the investigator, depending on who was on duty that day in the jurisdiction of the IPV incident. The choice of interventions in child removal decisions can vary from one CPS investigator to the next (Bhatti‐Sinclair & Sutcliffe, 2018; Hughes & Chau, 2013), with some investigators more likely to gravitate to child removal (Doyle, 2007). There are a few predictors of the decision‐making of workers to investigate or remove children, including: case factors (child race/ethnicity, gender, age, and socio‐economic status) but not the child's point of view; parental substance abuse; CPS organizational factors; and investigator characteristics – experience, stress level and personality (Lauritzen et al, 2018).…”