NORMALSTADIEN DER EMBRYONAL‐ENTWICKLUNG BEI DER HAUSENTE (<i>ANAS BOSCH AS DOMESTIC A</i>)*

Koecke, H. U.

doi:10.1111/j.1440-169x.1958.tb00147.x

Cited by 53 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Complete or partial embryonic development is known of few precocial or semiprecocial birds, particularly poultry and/or species of commercial importance like chickens, quail and other Phasianidae, and ducks (e.g. Fant, 1957;Rempel and Eastlick, 1957;Koecke, 1958;Mun and Kosin, 1960;Phillips and Williams, 1964;Hendrickx and Hanzlik, 1965;Kaltofen, 1971;Dupuy et al, 2002;Ainsworth et al, 2010;Ramteke et al, 2013). A few works have described all or some of the developmental stages of wild birds like Society finch Lonchura striata (Yamasaki and Tonosaki, 1988), Brandt cormorant Phalacrocorax penicillatus (Price, 1938), Barn owl Tyto alba (K€ oppl et al, 2005), emu Dromaius novaehollandiae (Nagai et al, 2011), lapwing Vanellus cristatus (Grosser and Tandler, 1909), Ad elie penguin Pygoscelis adeliae (Herbert, 1967), black stilt Himantopus novaezelandiae (Browne, 2006), and rock pigeon Columba livia (Olea and Sandoval, 2012).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development of the Superaltricial Monk Parakeet (Aves, Psittaciformes): Embryo Staging, Growth, and Heterochronies

Carril

Tambussi

2015

The Anatomical Record

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Knowledge about the embryonic stages of birds is important in answering many questions about development and evolution. We give the first description of 41 embryological stages of the monk parakeet (Myiopsitta monachus) on the basis of external morphology and comparison with the chicken. We also provide measurements of some external morphological characters (i.e. body mass, crown-rump, beak, forelimb, and third toe lengths) and perform comparisons with other precocial and altricial birds with the aim of identifying heterochronous developmental features. The following differences in the development of characters in the monk parakeet when compared with other birds were found: (1) delay of the feathers primordia, (2) wing buds initially greater than leg buds, (3) forelimbs and hindlimbs with similar relative size, (4) retroversion of the toe IV, (5) ventral curvature of the upper jaw, (6) positive regressions between stages and beak length with acceleration and higher values and III toe lengths with deceleration and lower values in the monk parakeet compared to the chicken. The growth pattern of the monk paraket Myiopsitta monachus could be influenced by some heterochronic processes like postdisplacement, acceleration and/or deceleration. Results of this research allow the standard identification of stages in different species of parrots, recognize similarities and differences between precocial (the chicken) and altricial species (Myiopsitta), and provide planning data for future studies.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of the Superaltricial Monk Parakeet (Aves, Psittaciformes): Embryo Staging, Growth, and Heterochronies

Carril

Tambussi

2015

The Anatomical Record

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Based on our observations of domestic goose embryos and on the studies of Hamburger and Hamilton (1951) and Koecke (1958), Hamburger-Hamilton (HH) developmental stages are assigned to the particular days of incubation.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of mechanical papillae of the tongue in the domestic goose (Anser anser f. domestica) during the embryonic period

Skieresz‐Szewczyk

Jackowiak

2015

Protoplasma

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three types of mechanical papillae, i.e., conical, filiform, and hair-like papillae, are present on the tongue in the domestic goose. Within conical papillae, we distinguish three categories: large and small conical papillae on the body and conical papillae on the lingual prominence. The arrangement of mechanical papillae on the tongue in Anseriformes is connected functionally with different feeding mechanisms such as grazing and filter-feeding. The present work aims to determine whether morphology of three types of mechanical papillae in goose at the time of hatching is the same as in an adult bird and if the tongue is prepared to fulfill feeding function. Our results revealed that the primordia of the large conical papillae start to develop during the differentiation stage. The primordia of the small conical papillae and conical papillae of the lingual papillae start to develop during the growth stage. At the end of the growth stage, only large conical papillae, three pairs of small conical papillae, and conical papillae of the lingual prominence have similar arrangement as in an adult bird. The shape and arrangement of the remaining small conical papillae probably will be changed after hatching. During embryonic period, the filiform papillae and hair-like papillae are not formed. The embryonic epithelium that covered the mechanical papillae undergoes transformation leading to the formation of multilayered epithelium. During prehatching stage, epithelium becomes orthokeratinized epithelium. In conclusion, the tongue of the domestic goose after hatching is well prepared only for grazing. The filtration of food from water is limited due to the lack of filiform papillae.

show abstract

“…A more or less complete coverage of the entire embryonic period has been described for Japanese quail (Zacchei, 1961) (from stage 4 onwards also described by (Ainsworth et al, 2010), Adélie penguin (Herbert, 1967), emu: (Nagai et al, 2011), turkey (Mun and Kosin, 1960), pheasant: (Fant, 1957), Pekin duck: (Kaltofen, 1971), mallard duck (Anas boschas) (Koecke, 1958) (including comparison of these stages to those of Hamburger and Hamilton and of Keibel and Abraham), society finch (Yamasaki and Tonosaki, 1988), zebra finch (Murray et al, 2013) and lapwing (Grosser and Tandler, 1909). Partial tables are available for many other bird species, sources for a subset of which are listed in a comprehensive book (Starck and Ricklefs, 1998) (see Table 2.3, page 40).…”

Section: Other Avian Reptilian and Mammalian Speciesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Staging tables for avian embryos: a little history

Stern¹

2018

Int. J. Dev. Biol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Absolute time elapsed since fertilization, or hours' incubation, is not a good measure of the precise degree of development of an embryo because there is considerable variation. The chick embryo benefits from a detailed, well defined staging system introduced by Hamburger and Hamilton in 1951, perhaps the most precise and detailed available for any species. This paper briefly reviews the background and legacy of this table, including the remarkable work of its predecessors, Mathias Duval and Franz Keibel. It also begs the question of why the mouse embryo still lacks a similarly precise classification.

show abstract

NORMALSTADIEN DER EMBRYONAL‐ENTWICKLUNG BEI DER HAUSENTE (ANAS BOSCH AS DOMESTIC A)*

Cited by 53 publications

References 17 publications

Development of the Superaltricial Monk Parakeet (Aves, Psittaciformes): Embryo Staging, Growth, and Heterochronies

Development of the Superaltricial Monk Parakeet (Aves, Psittaciformes): Embryo Staging, Growth, and Heterochronies

Development of mechanical papillae of the tongue in the domestic goose (Anser anser f. domestica) during the embryonic period

Staging tables for avian embryos: a little history

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About