2011
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2010.2086435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normalized Spectral Similarity Score (${\hbox{NS}}^{3}$) as an Efficient Spectral Library Searching Method for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessment of chromatic similarity between animal and background spectra using a nonbiological measure (Spectral Angle Mapper) In the field of remote sensing, automated spectral library search algorithms developed for hyper-spectral images (Chang 2003;Sweet 2003;Freek 2006;Nidamanuri and Zbell 2011) are used to compare reflectance spectra of known targets to those of novel spectra by computing a scalar similarity score between them. For these algorithms, stochastic methods are more frequently used than deterministic methods because imaging conditions can be imperfect and because the high spectral resolution of a hyper-spectral sensor often results in more than one material spectral signature in a given pixel.…”
Section: Study Site Animal and Substrate Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of chromatic similarity between animal and background spectra using a nonbiological measure (Spectral Angle Mapper) In the field of remote sensing, automated spectral library search algorithms developed for hyper-spectral images (Chang 2003;Sweet 2003;Freek 2006;Nidamanuri and Zbell 2011) are used to compare reflectance spectra of known targets to those of novel spectra by computing a scalar similarity score between them. For these algorithms, stochastic methods are more frequently used than deterministic methods because imaging conditions can be imperfect and because the high spectral resolution of a hyper-spectral sensor often results in more than one material spectral signature in a given pixel.…”
Section: Study Site Animal and Substrate Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical information on spectral bands may not be utilized Granahan and Sweet (2001) (Continued ) 8224 S. Shanmugam and P. SrinivasaPerumal Extensive spectral library with standard data grouping required for accuracy Nidamanuri and Zbell (2011a) JM-SAM-based mixed measure Combines the stochastic JeffriesMatusita distance and deterministic SAM Higher discriminability than JM and SAM Suitability to discriminate and assess proportions within a mixed pixel is yet to be assessed Padma and Sanjeevi (2014) International Journal of Remote Sensing 8225 cluster analysis to the advanced technique of automated matching by adapting to the following factors.…”
Section: Encoding Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is pertinent to mention here that integration of spectral libraries has resulted in increased accuracy of target matching and identification in several applications. Spectral library transfer in spatial (library spectra collected from many geographical locations) and temporal (library spectra collected at different instances) domains has been attempted for assessing spectral variability among crops such as alfalfa, triticale, winter barley, winter rape, winter rye, and winter wheat (Nidamanuri and Zbell 2011a). Spectral libraries in different applications are referred to as either 'spectral signature database' (Ruby and Fischer 2002), 'information service' (Leenaars 2013) or 'look-up table' (Mobley et al 2005).…”
Section: Spectral Librarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations