Normalized Intensity: The New Labour Process of Middle Management

Abstract

Based on qualitative interviews (n = 64) within five UK organizations that have embarked on large-scale restructuring (including delayering, downsizing, culture change, role redesign, lean production) we argue that middle managers are currently experiencing significant and progressive work and personal pressures. Performance is monitored more closely, hours and intensity of work are increasing, roles and tasks are changing frequently, and prospects for promotion are downscaled within flattened hierarchies. Whereas middle managers report increased levels of autonomy and skill, are often well remunerated, and frequently appear motivated (at least in the private sector), we suggest their burgeoning grievances over working hours, role pressures and promotion prospects have worrying implications for the future performance of UK industry. We argue further that the motivation for corporations to embark on such large-scale restructuring is best understood with reference to the incessant demands of international capitalism. We conclude that such restructuring, and the personal managerial experiences that result from it, is in keeping with many, but crucially not all, of the trends predicted by Bravermanian labour process theory. Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008.

Engagement y/o intensificación del trabajo ¿opción y/o obligación?: «Si no haces lo que te gusta, te tiene que gustar lo que haces»

“…Castillo, 2008;Castillo, 2007) es razonable plantear que los condicionantes de la intensificación se habrían vuelto cada vez más complejos (McCann et al, 2008). La intensificación (y el estrés laboral) no serían ya necesariamente un resultado de la falta directa de autonomía en el sentido tradicional, como sugeriría la teoría del proceso de trabajo (aunque también lo sea/pueda serlo), sino de la interacción de mecanismos que se retrotraerían a la formación de la subjetividad, que logran involucrar al trabajador y que necesitan ir más allá de las posiciones dualistas, de si los trabajadores se ven obligados o no, tal y como sugieren las posiciones teóricas postestucturalistas.…”

Establishments’ use of temporary agency workers: the influence of institutions and establishments’ employment strategies

“…However, the business systems framework tends to focus on core employees within collaborative hierarchies, largely downplaying other types of worker and their use by establishments (McCann et al, 2008). Indeed, recent labour-market developments have led to a bifurcation in the status of those employees on full-time contracts and those on more precarious contracts in organizations in some collaborative business systems (Allen and Whitley, 2012;Hassel, 2014;cf.…”

Extreme managers, extreme workplaces: Capitalism, organizations and corporate psychopaths

“…In the current era of "casino capitalism" (Sinn, 2010;Strange, 1997), where middle managers are reported to be experiencing increasing, significant and progressively intense work pressures (McCann, Morris, & Hassard, 2008) including work overload and bullying (Boyle, Granter, & McCann, 2013); the research into the role of Corporate Psychopaths provides valuable insights. Corporate Psychopathy theory has provided a means of understanding the increasing rise of psychopathic managers as toxic and bullying leaders (Lipman-Blumen, 2004 within organizations in western capitalist societies (Boddy, 2011a;Boddy, 2012;Wexler, 2008).…”