2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11128-009-0158-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normalization procedure for relaxation studies in NMR quantum information processing

Abstract: NMR quantum information processing studies rely on the reconstruction of the density matrix representing the so-called pseudo-pure states (PPS). An initially pure part of a PPS state undergoes unitary and non-unitary (relaxation) transformations during a computation process, causing a "loss of purity" until the equilibrium is reached. Besides, upon relaxation, the nuclear polarization varies in time, a fact which must be taken into account when comparing density matrices at different instants. Attempting to us… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will be able to quantify, along the time, how much the relaxation process departs from being unital and trace preserving, and we will also characterize how the relaxation process affects the normalization of expectation values. This way we will learn in which time window it is safe to assume the relaxation process is approximated unital or trace preserving, complementing other previous studies [6][7][8]. Thus we hope to shed some light in how one could compensate for the two drawbacks aforementioned, and consequently increase the time window for quantum simulations in liquid state NMR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will be able to quantify, along the time, how much the relaxation process departs from being unital and trace preserving, and we will also characterize how the relaxation process affects the normalization of expectation values. This way we will learn in which time window it is safe to assume the relaxation process is approximated unital or trace preserving, complementing other previous studies [6][7][8]. Thus we hope to shed some light in how one could compensate for the two drawbacks aforementioned, and consequently increase the time window for quantum simulations in liquid state NMR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Besides that, we want to follow the quantum process for very long times, much more than the spin-lattice relaxation time T 1 , what raises the problem of how to compare measurements taken in different times, which is what we call the normalization problem. A pedagogical discussion of why the state simulated by a pseudo-pure state evolves nonlienarly under the relaxation process, and an ad hoc phenomenological method to circumvent the normalization problem were presented by Gavini-Viana et al [8]. The basic idea is that a pseudo-pure state, according to Cory et al [5], has the form…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6). Renormalization is performed since our focus here is on the quantum state of the spins contributing to the signal and not in the number per se of participating spins [31]. The plots in Fig.…”
Section: B Super-zeno For State Preservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a way to overcome these limitations, we proposed a QST method using only short non-selective RF pulses with a coherence selection scheme [10]. As a result, many studies involving quadrupolar nuclei could benefit from that method, including research on quadrupolar spin decoherence and relaxation [11][12][13][14] and quantum simulation [15]. Section 2 briefly expounds the main concepts regarding PPS and logic gate implementation and QST in high-field NMR of quadrupolar nuclei.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%