2010
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1008.5055
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normalization for Implied Volatility

Masaaki Fukasawa

Abstract: We study specific nonlinear transformations of the Black-Scholes implied volatility to show remarkable properties of the volatility surface. Model-free bounds on the implied volatility skew are given. Pricing formulas for the European options which are written in terms of the implied volatility are given. In particular, we prove elegant formulas for the fair strikes of the variance swap and the gamma swap.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hyper-rough volatility, in a sense analogous to a H < 0 model, has also been considered [24,22], but also in this case spot volatility is not dened. The extreme T −1/2 speed of explosion for the skew expected in the H → 0 limit has been shown to be a model-free bound [26,12], and is reached under local volatility through a volatility function with a singularity ATM [30], but this poses the problem of time-consistency (see also [11]). To the best of our knowledge, this extreme behavior of the skew has not been shown for any (time-consistent) stochastic volatility model, where the volatility is a proper process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyper-rough volatility, in a sense analogous to a H < 0 model, has also been considered [24,22], but also in this case spot volatility is not dened. The extreme T −1/2 speed of explosion for the skew expected in the H → 0 limit has been shown to be a model-free bound [26,12], and is reached under local volatility through a volatility function with a singularity ATM [30], but this poses the problem of time-consistency (see also [11]). To the best of our knowledge, this extreme behavior of the skew has not been shown for any (time-consistent) stochastic volatility model, where the volatility is a proper process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This follows from the fact that d 2 (−∞) = −N −1 (P (S T = 0)) as shown in proposition 2.4 of [1]. Now, it holds…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Since l is increasing, the latter condition is equivalent to l 1 2 < 0. When δ > 1 2 , then N −1 (δ) is positive and both the solutions could be valid. Under the requirement l(δ) ≤ N −1 (δ) 2…”
Section: Conditions On L For the Existence Of σmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is given in [14] and shown to be sharp in [29]. This extreme skew corresponds to the H-power law with H = 0.…”
Section: Remark 43 a Model-free Bound Of Volatility Skewmentioning
confidence: 82%