2010
DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2010.518270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normality Test Based on a Truncated Mean Characterization

Abstract: This article generalizes a characterization based on a truncated mean to include higher truncated moments, and introduces a new normality goodness-of-fit test based on the truncated mean. The test is a weighted integral of the squared distance between the empirical truncated mean and its expectation. A closed form for the test statistic is derived. Assuming known parameters, the mean and the variance of the test are derived under the normality assumption. Moreover, a limiting distributionfor the proposed test … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the power of some normality tests is attenuated when dealing with non-normal distributions, particularly when distributions are near-normal and symmetric such as the t and beta distributions, respectively (e.g., Alizadeh Noughabi, & Arghami, 2011;Chaichatschwal & Budsaba, 2007;Farrell & Rogers-Stewart, 2006;Romão, Delgado, & Costa, 2010;Yacizi & Yolacan, 2007;Yap & Sim, 2011;Zghoul & Awad, 2010). That is, some normality tests show low power and this is more likely to occur when the distributions approach normality.…”
Section: Power Analysis Of Normality Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the power of some normality tests is attenuated when dealing with non-normal distributions, particularly when distributions are near-normal and symmetric such as the t and beta distributions, respectively (e.g., Alizadeh Noughabi, & Arghami, 2011;Chaichatschwal & Budsaba, 2007;Farrell & Rogers-Stewart, 2006;Romão, Delgado, & Costa, 2010;Yacizi & Yolacan, 2007;Yap & Sim, 2011;Zghoul & Awad, 2010). That is, some normality tests show low power and this is more likely to occur when the distributions approach normality.…”
Section: Power Analysis Of Normality Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KS = Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, AD = Anderson-Darling test, and SW = Shapiro-Wilk tests. Y&Y = Yacizi and Yolacan (2007), Z&A = Zghoul and Awad (2010), A&A = Alizadeh and Arghami (2011), R&cols = Romão et al (2010), S = Sürücü (2008), and R&W = Razali and Wah (2010). Only the results of Sürücü (2008) used α = .10.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%