2019
DOI: 10.1520/acem20180054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normality of Post-Crack Performance Data for Fiber-Reinforced Concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the purpose of calibrating γ R , numerical simulations considering characteristic values of each of the involved mechanical variables were carried out. To this end, the values of f Rk for each FRC were established by assuming normal distribution of f R [91] and imposing values of the coefficient of variation for f R (CoV fR ). In this regard, based on the results extracted from a large FRC mechanical characterization program [92] and values of CoV fR derived from a numerical study on the intrinsic scatter of FRCs presented in [93], values of CoV fR of 10.0, 17.5 and 25.0% were found representative for FRC-8, FRC-6, and FRC-4, respectively.…”
Section: Ultimate Bending Capacity and Global Safety Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the purpose of calibrating γ R , numerical simulations considering characteristic values of each of the involved mechanical variables were carried out. To this end, the values of f Rk for each FRC were established by assuming normal distribution of f R [91] and imposing values of the coefficient of variation for f R (CoV fR ). In this regard, based on the results extracted from a large FRC mechanical characterization program [92] and values of CoV fR derived from a numerical study on the intrinsic scatter of FRCs presented in [93], values of CoV fR of 10.0, 17.5 and 25.0% were found representative for FRC-8, FRC-6, and FRC-4, respectively.…”
Section: Ultimate Bending Capacity and Global Safety Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fR,1k and fR,3k shall be computed considering that: fR follows a log-normal probability density distribution according to EN 1990 [13] (5% quantile, 75% of confidence level); and that the standard deviation of fR is unknown unless explicitly agreed. Criteria to determine the statistic properties of fR and to assess the population standard deviation could be found in [38,39]. The value of fR,1k establish the strength class: SC (1,0; 1,5; 2,0; 2,5; 3,0; 3.5; 4,0; 4.5; 5,0; 6,0; 7,0; 8,0) and the ductility class is denominated by a letter "a", "b", "c", "d" or "e" when the ratio fR,3k…”
Section: Strength and Ductility Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the purpose of calibrating γ R , numerical simulations considering characteristic values of each of the involved mechanical variables were carried out. To this end, the values of f Rk for each FRC were established by assuming normal distribution of f R [91] and imposing values of the coefficient of variation for f R (CoV fR ). In this regard, based on the results extracted from a large FRC mechanical characterization program [92] and values of CoV fR derived from a numerical study on the intrinsic scatter of FRCs presented in [93], values of CoV fR of 10.0, 17.5 and 25.0%…”
Section: Ultimate Bending Capacity and Global Safety Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%