2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal width of the inter-recti distance in pregnant and postpartum primiparous women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
60
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
60
2
Order By: Relevance
“…the 20 th and the 80 th percentile, correspond to 49 79 mm below the umbilicus, 5486 mm at 2 cm above the umbilicus, and 479 mm at 5 cm above the umbilicus. At six months postpartum, the 20 th and the 80 th percentiles corre sponded to 921 mm at 2 cm below the umbilicus, from 17 to 28 mm at 2 cm above the umbilicus, and from 12 to 24 mm at 5 cm above the umbilicus [19]. It is also our experi ence that the distance is almost never uniform all along the linea alba.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the 20 th and the 80 th percentile, correspond to 49 79 mm below the umbilicus, 5486 mm at 2 cm above the umbilicus, and 479 mm at 5 cm above the umbilicus. At six months postpartum, the 20 th and the 80 th percentiles corre sponded to 921 mm at 2 cm below the umbilicus, from 17 to 28 mm at 2 cm above the umbilicus, and from 12 to 24 mm at 5 cm above the umbilicus [19]. It is also our experi ence that the distance is almost never uniform all along the linea alba.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…In another article the normal interrectal distance 2 cm above the navel was established to be 15 mm in postpartum women and 10 mm in nullip arous women [22]. However, a recent study showed that the normal width of the linea alba changes during pregnancy and in the postpartum period, depending also on the level of the US scan [19]. During pregnancy, the normal range of values, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several authors have shown differences in the muscle thickness in basketball [34] and baseball [30] players compared to non-athletic subjects. In addition, Kubo et al [52] reported a thickness increase of the abdominal wall muscles for elite football players in relation to amateur football players.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The USI examination of the abdominal wall muscles has been previously carried out in healthy populations [28,29], postpartum women [30] and several sport disciplines, such as baseball [26], handball [31], cricket [32], and female football players [33]. Moreover, differences in abdominal wall features were reported according to different levels of activity in basketball [34], tennis [35], and Pilates [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%