1999
DOI: 10.1159/000026083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal Values of Lower Limb Nerve Conduction in Kuwait

Abstract: Objectives: To establish the normal electrophysiological values of the common lower limb nerves and to study the relationship of conduction velocity (CV) of the lower limb nerves to height and age in healthy adult subjects. Methods: Nerve conduction investigations were performed on the lower limbs of 51 screened healthy volunteers using standard electrophysiological techniques. Results: Fifty-one subjects (21 males and 30 females) participated in the study. The mean (± SD) ages of the subjects were 38 (±8.82) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The secondary outcome measure was the assessment of neuropathy by means of an NCS, performed on all patients using established, standard techniques [ 12 , 13 ]. Measurements of latencies, amplitudes and conduction velocities were evaluated using previously established cut-off values, for the motor (peroneal, tibial, median and ulnar) and sensory (sural, median and ulnar) nerves [ 3 , 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secondary outcome measure was the assessment of neuropathy by means of an NCS, performed on all patients using established, standard techniques [ 12 , 13 ]. Measurements of latencies, amplitudes and conduction velocities were evaluated using previously established cut-off values, for the motor (peroneal, tibial, median and ulnar) and sensory (sural, median and ulnar) nerves [ 3 , 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values for the NCS scored 0 for normal and 1 for abnormal. The cut‐off values used for individual nerves were established and published previously [10,11]. The normal range used for NCS was the mean reference values ± 2 standard deviations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,11,21 Most of our values were similar to four other similar published studies. 2,3,5,8,13,21,22,23 However, there were some differences, which could be attributed to different NCS techniques, machine settings, and demographic characteristics. A notable dissimilarity was in the CMAP and the SNAP amplitudes because some studies used peak-to-peak measurement and others used baseline-to-negative peak measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NCS data interpretation is influenced by some technical and physiological factors, such as fixed measurements, skin temperature, height, Body Mass Index (BMI), gender and age; In addition to the nerve diameter and degree of myelination. 2,3,[5][6][7][8] It is clearly required, in a clinical setting, to have standardized data acquired from a sample population that represents, as nearly as possible, the demographic and ethnic features of the examined patients. 2,3 In the context of developing normative data for nerve conduction studies among healthy Omani adults for our Neurophysiology laboratory, we aimed also to examine the influence of gender on our data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%