2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.11.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal right and left ventricular mass development during early infancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Left-right anatomical differences of the cerebral hemispheres have been detected by ultrasound scanning as early as 18 weeks postconception (8). In infants, the right hemisphere has been reported to develop functionally and anatomically earlier than the left hemisphere in various respects, including that left hemisphere language-related brain regions develop more slowly than their contralateral counterparts (9)(10)(11). These observations indicate a broadly lateralized program of motor and cognitive development that begins in utero in our species and suggest that a general model can involve different rates of maturation on the two sides of the central nervous system (CNS).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Left-right anatomical differences of the cerebral hemispheres have been detected by ultrasound scanning as early as 18 weeks postconception (8). In infants, the right hemisphere has been reported to develop functionally and anatomically earlier than the left hemisphere in various respects, including that left hemisphere language-related brain regions develop more slowly than their contralateral counterparts (9)(10)(11). These observations indicate a broadly lateralized program of motor and cognitive development that begins in utero in our species and suggest that a general model can involve different rates of maturation on the two sides of the central nervous system (CNS).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RV free-wall mass was calculated using end-diastolic measurements in the following previously validated formula: RV free-wall mass= 5.84 (RV cavity area) (RV free-wall thickness) + 1.0 (Joyce et al). 14,15 For comparing echocardiographic measures in subjects of differing body size, these measures were indexed to BSA to a power of 0.5 for a linear dimension) and to a power of 1 for area and mass (Gutgessel et al). 13 where ET is Ejection Time and PI is Pulse Interval expressed in seconds (Joyce et al).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The apical 4-chamber view was used to measure the RV cavity cross-sectional area by tracing the endocardial border (Joyce et al). 14,15 RV free-wall thickness at end-diastole was measured from either the subcostal, coronal or parasternal-axis view, whichever view most clearly illustrated the RV epicardium and endocardium. RV free-wall mass was calculated using end-diastolic measurements in the following previously validated formula: RV free-wall mass= 5.84 (RV cavity area) (RV free-wall thickness) + 1.0 (Joyce et al).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The left ventricle, defined as left ventricular free wall+interventricular septum (Fulton et al, 1952;Joyce et al, 2004;Keen, 1955), was separated from the remainder of the heart and weighed to either 0.1 mg (ventricles<30 g; AE163, Mettler, Greifensee, Switzerland) or 1.0 mg (>30 g; 1265 MP, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany). The left ventricle was bisected along the mid-equator, and random linear measurements of transmural wall thickness (×4), and inner (×2) and outer (×2) diameters were taken with digital callipers to 0.01 mm.…”
Section: Left Ventricle Mass and Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%