1966
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.97.1.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal Interpediculate Distances (Minimum and Maximum) in Children and Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
64
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
8
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of lumbar IPDs at each level in Marfan patients (in the present study) and normal controls (from Hinck et al 1966). Note that the IPD values are significantly greater at all levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison of lumbar IPDs at each level in Marfan patients (in the present study) and normal controls (from Hinck et al 1966). Note that the IPD values are significantly greater at all levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The normal interpedicular distances of the spine on plain radiographs were studied by Hinck et al (1966). Although Schwarz (1956) and Elsberg and Dyke (1934) had established normal values, they provided no information on sample size and standard deviations and therefore their norms could not be used for statistical comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Perese & Fracasso (1959) have measured the spinal cord transvers diameter on 30 cases; Nordqvist (1964) has measured spatium subarachnoideum and spinal cord diameters on 101 cases which consisted of a variety of age groups; Hinck et al (1966) have measured normal vertebral canal transvers diameters on children and the adults. Evangelou et al (2005) have studied the diversity of spinal cord cross-sectional surface area in multiple sclerosis in terms of age and gender.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%