2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2017.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal Interdigitation Zone Loss by Motion-Tracked OCT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of foveal bulge, foveal depression, or inner-retinal-layer thinning (all as seen on SD-OCT) was considered to represent confirmation of foveal area. For inclusion, all of the images were reviewed to confirm centered scans, a lack of artifacts, 12,13 and a signal quality > 20 dB.…”
Section: Imaging Of Outer-retinal Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of foveal bulge, foveal depression, or inner-retinal-layer thinning (all as seen on SD-OCT) was considered to represent confirmation of foveal area. For inclusion, all of the images were reviewed to confirm centered scans, a lack of artifacts, 12,13 and a signal quality > 20 dB.…”
Section: Imaging Of Outer-retinal Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park et al reported finding reduced reflectivity of the IZ due to the tilted OCT image when using the Heidelberg Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) and that the hyper-reflective Henle fiber layer is a telltale sign. 14 Meanwhile, Otani et al showed by intentionally tilting the OCT image to visualize the Henle fiber layer when using the same spectral domain OCT device as ours, their OCT image could visualize the IZ in both the hyper-reflective Henle layer side and the opposite side. 15 This discrepancy indicates that this phenomenon might be affected by the apparatus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It is possible that a small fraction of our subjects had a physiologic IZ area smaller than the 9 mm 2 scan area imaged on SD-OCT, which could overestimate their extent of IZ attenuation [43]. Qualitative studies have also suggested that IZ reflectivity is influenced by the angle at which the eye is imaged [44]. Due to these considerations, we believe IZ loss may represent a more consistent measure of IZ disruption than IZ attenuation.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 89%