2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal glenoid vault anatomy and validation of a novel glenoid implant shape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of correction that is required is not clearly defined. Normal glenoid version varies within the population over a range of about 20 , 1,2,6,11 with the majority of patients having slight retroversion and average retroversion of 1-2 of retroversion. Without knowing the patient's native version, an arbitrary goal of glenoid position has been to place the glenoid perpendicular to the plane of the scapula.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of correction that is required is not clearly defined. Normal glenoid version varies within the population over a range of about 20 , 1,2,6,11 with the majority of patients having slight retroversion and average retroversion of 1-2 of retroversion. Without knowing the patient's native version, an arbitrary goal of glenoid position has been to place the glenoid perpendicular to the plane of the scapula.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its profile is thus linked to the shape of the thorax rather than genetic determination. As regards its articular face, the glenoid is compared to a vault (Kwon et al, 2005;Codsi et al, 2008). It can be positioned with respect to the body with major variations in translation and in version in a transverse plan, or tilt in a frontal plane.…”
Section: Position Of the Glenoid On The Scapulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches have a two-fold advantage: they are not subject to variability of the scapular blade, and they use a portion of bone most often available in archaeological specimens. Work with 3D CT reconstruction has shown that the endosteal volume of the glenoid vault has a uniform morphology (Kwon et al, 2005;Bicknell et al, 2007;Codsi et al, 2008) and can be used alone in 2D CT to measure glenoid version (Poon and Ting, 2012). To that end, the axial section perpendicular to the articular face of the glenoid, based on the initial X-ray image is preferred.…”
Section: Measuring Glenoid Retroversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is best accomplished via a CT scan with 3-D reconstructions [70]. If there is inadequate bone, grafting can be performed with canellous graft in a two stage procedure as described by Cheung [71].…”
Section: Managing a Failed Glenoidmentioning
confidence: 99%