2011
DOI: 10.1307/mmj/1320763051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal forms, hermitian operators, and CR maps of spheres and hyperquadrics

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We study holomorphic mappings between the sphere S 2 ⊂ C 2 and the hyperquadric S 3 ε ⊂ C 3 , which for ε = ±1 is given by S 3 ± := (z 1 , z 2 , z 3 ) ∈ C 3 : |z 1 | 2 + |z 2 | 2 ± |z 3 | 2 = 1 , so that S 3 + = S 3 is the sphere in C 3 . Faran [Far82] classified holomorphic mappings between spheres in C 2 and C 3 and Lebl [Leb11] classified mappings sending S 2 to S 3 − . In [Rei14a] we give a new CR-geometric approach to reprove Faran's and Lebl's results in a unified manner.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We study holomorphic mappings between the sphere S 2 ⊂ C 2 and the hyperquadric S 3 ε ⊂ C 3 , which for ε = ±1 is given by S 3 ± := (z 1 , z 2 , z 3 ) ∈ C 3 : |z 1 | 2 + |z 2 | 2 ± |z 3 | 2 = 1 , so that S 3 + = S 3 is the sphere in C 3 . Faran [Far82] classified holomorphic mappings between spheres in C 2 and C 3 and Lebl [Leb11] classified mappings sending S 2 to S 3 − . In [Rei14a] we give a new CR-geometric approach to reprove Faran's and Lebl's results in a unified manner.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the notation of this paper, the main result in [15] implies that D * (H(2; 3, 1) ∩ I (r)) = 3 and the main result in [19] states that D * (H(2; 2, 2) ∩ I (r)) = 3. Combining the results from [14,19] and this section yields an almost complete answer in domain dimension two. We do not know whether D * (J ) is finite in case (A, B) is (3,2) or (2,3).…”
Section: Example 71 Letmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, assuming that in(p) = (2, 1, 0), p has to be the defining equation for a sphere, and pq has the signature for a defining equation of the hyperquadric Q(2, 1). The second author verified in [19] that there is (up to a linear change of coordinates) only one such map, and therefore it must be the one above. Furthermore, pq cannot be made diagonal after any linear change of coordinates.…”
Section: Proposition 41mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations