2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2860(00)00795-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal coordinate analyses of ruthenium–sulfur dioxide complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, a Ru−S peak assignment could stand to reason as a Raman shift at 360 cm −1 has previously been classified as a Ru−S stretching mode for 1, using the H/D isotope shift to aid assignment, as well as calculations. 48 A normal coordinate analysis was performed on 1 in the same study which revealed that both Ru−S and Ru−Cl stretching modes dominate the potential energy distributions for this Raman shift, with respective proportions of 24.9 and 56.0%; that is, this Raman shift exhibits a mixed contribution of vibrational modes.…”
Section: Characterizing Thementioning
confidence: 93%
“…On the other hand, a Ru−S peak assignment could stand to reason as a Raman shift at 360 cm −1 has previously been classified as a Ru−S stretching mode for 1, using the H/D isotope shift to aid assignment, as well as calculations. 48 A normal coordinate analysis was performed on 1 in the same study which revealed that both Ru−S and Ru−Cl stretching modes dominate the potential energy distributions for this Raman shift, with respective proportions of 24.9 and 56.0%; that is, this Raman shift exhibits a mixed contribution of vibrational modes.…”
Section: Characterizing Thementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The intense band at 989 cm −1 has both SO 2 units in a symmetric stretch but in an antisymmetric mode, that is, as one expands the other contracts, while that at 1119 cm −1 has the converse, that is, each SO 2 in an antisymmetric stretching vibration but coupled symmetrically. The assigned vibrations occur in the expected ranges. , …”
Section: Infrared Spectramentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The assigned vibrations occur in the expected ranges. 88,89 The isomeric disulfenate structure Ru(bpy) 2 (SO • SO) as an alternative formulation of species 1 was excluded above, but to be sure, the infrared spectrum of this isomer was calculated. It is shown in Figure 9C.…”
Section: Infrared Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in the intensity of several weak peaks that are characteristic of Ru-N amine bending modes (480–490 cm –1 ) 53 and amine rocking modes (815 cm –1 ) 52 also becomes more apparent by ca. 230 K (see Figure 6 ), while vibrational modes that are associated with amine stretching modes are also present at 3200–3350 cm –1 (for details, see the Supporting Information ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thereby, three peaks are significant at 90 K: the largest peak at 340 cm –1 , which represents a Ru–OSO vibrational stretch; 44 the more modest peak at 540 cm –1 , which is indicative of an SO 2 deformation mode of the η 1 -OSO isomer; 44 , 53 and the weakest peak at 1130 cm –1 , which is reminiscent of an η 1 -SO 2 symmetric stretching mode. 43 , 44 , 53 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%