2001
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01jn02842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal Brain and Brain Tumor: Multicomponent Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Line Scan Imaging

Abstract: Magnetic resonance line scan diffusion imaging of the brain, with diffusion weighting between 5 and 5,000 sec/mm(2), was performed in healthy subjects and patients with a 1.5-T machine. For each voxel, biexponential signal decay fits produced two apparent diffusion constants and respective signal amplitudes. Images based on these parameters show potential for use in the differentiation of gray and white matter, edema, and tumor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
130
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
11
130
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Models reflecting dynamic parameters, such as membrane restriction and permeability (27), and geometrical features (28) have been considered, but those distinct models lead to a diffusion signal decay which is nevertheless well approximated by a biexponential function (29)(30)(31)(32). Indeed, the estimates for the diffusion coefficients and the respective volume fractions of the SDP and FDP have been strikingly consistent across literature (33)(34)(35). Hence, unsurprisingly, the diffusion data that we obtained at different b values in a resting condition (Fig.…”
Section: Functional Diffusion Mrimentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Models reflecting dynamic parameters, such as membrane restriction and permeability (27), and geometrical features (28) have been considered, but those distinct models lead to a diffusion signal decay which is nevertheless well approximated by a biexponential function (29)(30)(31)(32). Indeed, the estimates for the diffusion coefficients and the respective volume fractions of the SDP and FDP have been strikingly consistent across literature (33)(34)(35). Hence, unsurprisingly, the diffusion data that we obtained at different b values in a resting condition (Fig.…”
Section: Functional Diffusion Mrimentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Fast and slow diffusion components have been described in a human brain model, 34,35 and the fast diffusion components have been reported to be the main source of signal at a relatively low b-value, whereas the slow diffusion components dominate the signal intensity at a high b-value. 37 Increased cellularity of the tumor leads to a greater proportion of intracellular compared to extracellular water components, whereas decreased cellularity indicates a greater proportion of relatively easily diffusible extracellular water components. 38,39 Even though intracellular water components are not exactly the same as the slow diffusion components and extracellular water components are not the same as the fast diffusion components, the components are considered to correspond.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the use of different b-values can lead to considerable variability in the calculated monoexponential ADC (14). Other models, such as the biexponential model and the stretched-exponential model (15,16), are more suitable to describe the admixture of multiple exponential signal decays, but they require data acquisition with additional b-values (thus prolonging scan time). Moreover, multiexponential analysis routines are usually not available in standard clinical software packages.…”
Section: Development Of Dwi: From the Brain To The Entire Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%