2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00440-013-0517-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal approximation for a random elliptic equation

Abstract: We consider solutions of an elliptic partial differential equation in R d with a stationary, random conductivity coefficient that is also periodic with period L. Boundary conditions on a square domain of width L are arranged so that the solution has a macroscopic unit gradient. We then consider the average flux that results from this imposed boundary condition. It is known that in the limit L → ∞, this quantity converges to a deterministic constant, almost surely. Our main result is that the law of this random… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also mention related work on the fluctuations ofā L (cf. (1.15)) by Nolen [47,48] (who was first to use Chatterjee's second-order Poincaré inequalities [7,8] in stochastic homogenization), the second author and Nolen [23], Rossignol [50], and Biskup, Salvi, and Wolff [6]. Note that the present contribution originates in the attempt to upgrade the results in [23] into a functional CLT for an energy density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We also mention related work on the fluctuations ofā L (cf. (1.15)) by Nolen [47,48] (who was first to use Chatterjee's second-order Poincaré inequalities [7,8] in stochastic homogenization), the second author and Nolen [23], Rossignol [50], and Biskup, Salvi, and Wolff [6]. Note that the present contribution originates in the attempt to upgrade the results in [23] into a functional CLT for an energy density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Versions of (11.3) have been proved in [34,37,8,35,18], with the quantity J replaced by spatial averages of the energy density of the correctors and approximations to the corrector. A version of (11.5) was proved in [31,30], while a version of (11.6) with u r (z) replaced by ∫ Φz,r (u − E[u]) was proved in [24].…”
Section: Informal Heuristics and Statement Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, they were the first to obtain estimates for the correctors at the critical scalings, albeit with suboptimal stochastic integrability (typically finite moment bounds) and with somewhat restrictive ergodic assumptions. Later, central limit theorems for the spatial averages of the gradients and the energy densities of the correctors were obtained using these techniques [34,31,30,18]. These important and influential results were the first to give a complete quantitative picture of the behavior of the first-order correctors on any stochastic model, and have inspired a huge amount of subsequent research.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was extended by Gu and Mourrat, in a non-obvious way, to characterize the leading order of the fluctuations of the homogenization error and to show that they are Gaussian [36], still relying on [39,Theorem 1]. Incidentally, the Gaussianity of fluctuations in stochastic homogenization was first established on the level of the error in the representative volume element method: [18] in the smallcontrast case, [30] based on Nolen's [42], and [44]. A quite different approach to, among other things, Gaussianity of leading-order fluctuations of the corrector, motivated by the approach to quantitative stochastic homogenization in [7], was carried out by Armstrong, Kuusi and Mourrat [5] (after being announced in [36]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%