1989
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(89)90789-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal and anomalous coronary arteries: Definitions and classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
301
4
15

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 378 publications
(351 citation statements)
references
References 258 publications
4
301
4
15
Order By: Relevance
“…These data as well as the results of a registry analysing coronary angiograms of 126 595 consecutive patients did not suggest a significant correlation between coronary anomalies and the incidence of atherosclerotic plaque [13]. Should atherosclerosis occur in the common trunk of a single artery, however, the clinical consequences would usually be serious, because the dependent myocardial territory includes the whole heart and no collateral circulation can develop [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These data as well as the results of a registry analysing coronary angiograms of 126 595 consecutive patients did not suggest a significant correlation between coronary anomalies and the incidence of atherosclerotic plaque [13]. Should atherosclerosis occur in the common trunk of a single artery, however, the clinical consequences would usually be serious, because the dependent myocardial territory includes the whole heart and no collateral circulation can develop [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Although CAAs are rare with reported prevalences of 0.3 to 5.64% of patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography and 0.3 to 0.5% of autopsies, they can be responsible for cardiovascular morbidity and even mortality. [10][11][12] Malignant anomalies may have serious implications such as angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, syncope, cardiac arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, or sudden death. 13 Especially in the young, coronary anomalies are an important cause of sport-related sudden cardiac death.…”
Section: Coronary Artery Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In the proposed case, the two branches originated at the right sinus of Valsalva single ostium and go to the posterior/inferior wall of the left ventricle, a territory that could be either of the RCA (which would be called dominant, in such case) or of the circumflex (which would be called dominant, in such case). Since both coronary branches originated from the right sinus of Valsalva, the two should be considered part of a dominant RCA: the unusual feature was the presence of two separate branches supplying the posterior descending territory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…I contend that the entity they describe is actually neither rare (indeed, it is the most frequent of coronary anomalies, being 1.23% of a continuous series of a general population, if one uses defined criteria of normality and anomalies and performs prospective studies), 2 nor is it a case of two RCAs. The case is indeed one of ''split right coronary artery.''…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%