2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-017-1392-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal adhesive contact on rough surfaces: efficient algorithm for FFT-based BEM resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the criteria (27) and (29) work well to predict the transitions of behavior, and the transition between the separated and combined debris formation is especially well matched by the MD simulations.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the criteria (27) and (29) work well to predict the transitions of behavior, and the transition between the separated and combined debris formation is especially well matched by the MD simulations.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The stress and strain tensors σ(x i , z j ) and ε(x i , z j ) are evaluated using a code based on the application of Green's functions defined for a tangential point load applied at the surface of a semi-infinite medium. 26,27 The comparison of the results from the BEM with the analytical expression of E el,Nq is shown in Fig. 8.…”
Section: Boundary Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed review can be found in [12]. Three-dimensional numerical methods, in particular the boundary element method have been recently very frequently used to simulate the pull-off process of adhesive contact of different indenters, for example based on the JKR-model (Johnson, Kendall and Roberts) by Pohrt and Popov (2015) [13], or using the Dugdale potential by Bazrafshan et al (2017) [14], and by Molibari et al (2017) [15]. In this paper we will use the method of [13] to simulate adhesive contacts of the cluster system.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimization problem above is then solved using a constrained conjugate gradient approach; see, e.g., [26,30]. Finally, we recall that model P L h is an approximation of model P L , so that solutions to these problems may dier due to the discretization error.…”
Section: Discretization Of the Truncated Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%