Norm Contestation and Normative Transformation in Global Peacebuilding Order(s): The Cases of China, Japan, and Russia

Abstract

Focusing on the disconnect between mainstream “liberal” peacebuilding and the discourses and practices of “new” and “alternative” peacebuilding actors, this article develops a nonbinary approach that goes beyond norm localization to capture the ways in which major powers influence the nature, content, and direction of normative change. Within the context of their bilateral and multilateral contributions to the “global peacebuilding order,” what forms and types of interventions are conceived by these actors as peacebuilding? How, in turn, has the substantive content of their peacebuilding practices (re)shaped norms and narratives in international peacebuilding efforts? Based on extensive empirical research of the peacebuilding policies and activities of China, Japan, and Russia, this article analyzes the way in which these “top-top” dynamics between norms embedded in the liberal narrative and major powers with competing visions can influence peacebuilding as practiced and pursued in host states. In doing so, it brings together research on global norms and peacebuilding studies and offers a simple yet analytically powerful tool to better understand the evolution of global peacebuilding order(s) and the role of rising powers in (re)shaping global governance.

Emerging Donors' Engagements in Africa: China, India, and the Localizing Peacebuilding and Development Interventions

“…This concern has arisen in discussions at the United Nations around the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) principle, during which emerging donors expressed concerns about coercive interventions; it is also visible in the peacebuilding intervention norms promoted by emerging donors (Paczyńska 2020; Jütersonke et al. 2021; Polle 2023). As I discuss elsewhere (Paczyńska 2020, 2021), these norms often have been strained, especially when it came to emerging donors' engagements in their geographic neighborhoods.…”

Geopolitical Dynamics of Greater Eurasia

“…Added to these disputes are the ambitions of regional leadership. They are typical for Iran, China, Saudi Arabia and Turkey [2].…”

Digital Peacebuilding: A Framework for Critical–Reflexive Engagement

“…Moreover, research on digital peacebuilding is also commonly colored by theoretical assumptions not only about what constitutes "peacebuilding" but also what forms of peacebuilding are desirable. Of course, normative struggles over the "right" peacebuilding approach have a long history in both the research and the practice of peacebuilding ( Lemay-Hébert and Kappler 2016 ; Donais and McCandless 2017 ;Jütersonke et al 2021 ), and particularly critical approaches do not shy away from taking particular theoretical angles that take normative stances.…”