“…Methodological quality is shown in Table 1, being good in eight RCTs (Antunes Marques et al, 2019; Bang & Shin, 2017; Ebersbach et al, 2010, 2014; Franzoni et al, 2018; Granziera et al, 2021; Passos‐Monteiro et al, 2020; Reuter et al, 2011) and fair in four studies (Cugusi et al, 2015; Monteiro et al, 2017; Wróblewska et al, 2019) All the trials accomplished items 1 (random allocation), 9 (between‐group comparison) and 10 (point estimates and variability). Items 3 (baseline comparability), 7 (adequate follow‐up) and 6 (blinding assessors) were met by 92%, 83% and 75% of the included studies respectively.…”