Nordic responses to Covid-19: Governance and policy measures in the early phases of the pandemic

Abstract

This paper explores and compares health system responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, in the context of existing governance features. Content compiled in the Covid-19 Health System Response Monitor combined with other publicly available country information serve as the foundation for this analysis. The analysis mainly covers early response until August 2020, but includes some key policy and epidemiological developments up until December 2020. Our findings suggest that despite the many similarities in adopted policy measures, the five countries display differences in implementation as well as outcomes. Declaration of state of emergency has differed in the Nordic region, whereas the emphasis on specialist advisory agencies in the decision-making process is a common feature. There may be differences in how respective populations complied with the recommended measures, and we suggest that other structural and circumstantial factors may have an important role in variations in outcomes across the Nordic countries. The high incidence rates among migrant populations and temporary migrant workers, as well as differences in working conditions are important factors to explore further. An important question for future research is how the COVID-19 epidemic will

COVID-19 pandemic, global spread, issues, and challenges

“…The study has recommended RIKA's COVID-19 risk assessment tools to have a comprehensive understanding of the community, individual behavior, social compliance, and exposure factors that guide in identifying relevant areas of intervention. The findings of Saunes et al. (2021) also suggest similar perspectives as they demonstrate differences in implementation as well as outcomes in each governing context and points out the decision-making process as a key factor.…”

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Norwegian Stock Market

“…The health systems in Norway, Denmark, and Sweden are similar in the sense that they are all tax-based and locally managed, with universal coverage for all residents. However, Saunes et al (2021) suggest that the epidemiological situation has varied across these countries, which may reflect different policy responses as well as institutional structures. Therefore, it is unclear ex ante whether the stock market movements (which ultimately reflected investors' expectation on the future economy) in Norway, Denmark, and Sweden would behave similarly.…”

Visiting crowded places during the COVID-19 pandemic. A panel study among adult Norwegians

“…A national lockdown was introduced on March 12th, 2020. Within 3 weeks, the incidence of infected people (per 2 weeks) was markedly reduced from a moderate level to a very low level ( 2 , 3 ). Contributing to this was a high level of compliance with health authorities' restrictions and recommendations.…”