2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2019.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nordhaus–Gaddum type inequalities for the two largest Laplacian eigenvalues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, we can take the graphs where f (µ 2 , µ 2 , n) = 0 and extend the conjecture presenting the extremal graphs. After running RioGraphX for all graphs ranging from 5 to 10 vertices, no counterexamples were found and the obtained extremal graphs motivated the statement of Conjecture 5 in [Grijó et al, 2019]. Table 5 shows the results of the tests with different numbers of workers (nodes) where we can see that the proposed conjecture was confirmed in times considered optimal given the size of the dataset used (see Table 4), a large number of calculations performed and the ordering of the results.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Also, we can take the graphs where f (µ 2 , µ 2 , n) = 0 and extend the conjecture presenting the extremal graphs. After running RioGraphX for all graphs ranging from 5 to 10 vertices, no counterexamples were found and the obtained extremal graphs motivated the statement of Conjecture 5 in [Grijó et al, 2019]. Table 5 shows the results of the tests with different numbers of workers (nodes) where we can see that the proposed conjecture was confirmed in times considered optimal given the size of the dataset used (see Table 4), a large number of calculations performed and the ordering of the results.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Therefore, we have µ n−2 (H(n 3 , n 4 )) = 2. Then by Lemma 5, we have In [12](see Theorem 7), the authors proved that µ n−2 (G) + µ n−2 (G) 󰃍 2 is true for the graph G when D(G) ∕ = 2 and D(G) ∕ = 2. Combining with this result, µ n−2 (G)+µ n−2 (G) 󰃍 2 is proved to be true for all graphs except the graph G which satisfys D(G) = 2, D(G) = 3, and both G and G have a K 3 as a subgraph.…”
Section: Ng-inequality For µ N−2 (G)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, Grijó et al [12] studied NG-inequality for µ n−2 (G). They showed that µ n−2 (G) + µ n−2 (G) 󰃍 2 when G or G is disconnected, G is a bipartite graph, a regular graph, or when G and G have diameter not equal to 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%