2003
DOI: 10.1081/cbi-120023679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonvisual Photoreceptors in Arthropods with Emphasis on Their Putative Role as Receptors of Natural Zeitgeber Stimuli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They end up on the posterior surface of the adult optic lobe, readily distinguished by their dark screening pigment. Such adult derivatives of larval stemmata have been reported for lepidoptera (Ichikawa 1991), beetles (Schulz et al 1984), ants (Felisberti and Ventura 1996), flies (Seifert et al 1987), caddisflies (Hagberg 1986), and other insects (Fleissner and Fleissner 2003;Gilbert 1994). Originally thought to be degenerate remnants in adults, accumulating morphological and physiological evidence indicates that the stemmata remain functional in adults (Ichikawa 1991;Gilbert 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…They end up on the posterior surface of the adult optic lobe, readily distinguished by their dark screening pigment. Such adult derivatives of larval stemmata have been reported for lepidoptera (Ichikawa 1991), beetles (Schulz et al 1984), ants (Felisberti and Ventura 1996), flies (Seifert et al 1987), caddisflies (Hagberg 1986), and other insects (Fleissner and Fleissner 2003;Gilbert 1994). Originally thought to be degenerate remnants in adults, accumulating morphological and physiological evidence indicates that the stemmata remain functional in adults (Ichikawa 1991;Gilbert 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Behavioral experiments with different fly mutants showed that, besides the compound eyes and the ocelli, at least three different non-visual channels are additionally involved in synchronizing the circadian clock: the Hofbauer-Buchner eyelet (discussed above), the blue-light photopigment cryptochrome, and unknown photopigments in clock-geneexpressing dorsal neurons (Helfrich-Forster et al, 2001;Rieger et al, 2003). Other putative extra-retinal photoreceptors described in different hemi-and holometabolous insect orders are the lamina and lobula organs, located in the optic lobe (Fleissner and Fleissner, 2003). The laminar organs have been found on the proximal dorso-frontal rim of the lamina, the part of the optic lobe where we found strong UV opsin-and PER-immunoreactivity in the bumblebee (Fig.·6).…”
Section: Putative Non-visual Extra-retinal Photoreceptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ßuorescence surrounding the eyes of Reticulitermes workers shows that these areas are opaque to UV light and may be allowing exposure of UV photosensors in the head. UV chromophores are known to be involved in insect sight (Kay 1969;Eckert 1971), and photoreceptors have been reported from within the brain (protocerebrum) itself (Gao et al 1999, Fleissner andFleissner 2003). There is also precedence for photoreception that involves areas of modiÞed cuticle on the head that allow penetration of restricted frequencies of light (Meyer 1977, Hardie et al 1981, Seifert et al 1987.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%