2013
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/104/29901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonviolation of Bell’s inequality in translation invariant systems

Abstract: The nature of quantum correlations in strongly correlated systems has been a subject of intense research. In particular, it has been realized that entanglement and quantum discord are present at quantum phase transitions and are able to characterize them. Surprisingly, it has been shown for a number of different systems that qubit pairwise states, even when highly entangled, do not violate Bell's inequalities, being in this sense local. Here we show that such a local character of quantum correlations traces ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduced density matrices on two sites, which display mixed entangled states, are not sufficient to violate the CGLMP inequality in the spin-1 chain, although many-body ground states are pure and highly entangled in this model. As the CHSH correlation has monogamy trade-off relation [ 15 ], monogamy of the CGLMP correlation can be a candidate to explain the non-violation of CGLMP inequality in the spin-1 chain. Therefore, in order to detect nonlocality in this model, one should consider multipartite Bell correlations for arbitrary dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reduced density matrices on two sites, which display mixed entangled states, are not sufficient to violate the CGLMP inequality in the spin-1 chain, although many-body ground states are pure and highly entangled in this model. As the CHSH correlation has monogamy trade-off relation [ 15 ], monogamy of the CGLMP correlation can be a candidate to explain the non-violation of CGLMP inequality in the spin-1 chain. Therefore, in order to detect nonlocality in this model, one should consider multipartite Bell correlations for arbitrary dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first, Bell correlations for many-body systems are applied to two-site reduced density states which are generated from the ground state in one-dimensional (1D) spin-1/2 XY model [ 13 ] and spin-1/2 XXZ model [ 14 ]. As a result, it has been known that the Bell correlation demonstrates the non-analyticity at the critical point while, due to the monogamy characteristics of the correlation, any bipartite Bell inequality is not violated by the translational invariant many-body systems [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…discord in the case of tripartite pure states [47]. Assuming that the optimizations for both quantum discord and quantum work deficit of the bipartite state ρ AB takes place for the same ensemble {p k , ρ k AB }, from the definition of quantum discord and quantum work deficit, one can show that (51) where H({p k }) is the Shannon entropy originating from the local measurement on the party B. Since H({p k }) ≥ S(ρ B ), W ← (ρ AB ) ≥ D ← (ρ AB ).…”
Section: Monogamy Of Other Quantum Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists no-go theorems which place parallel restrictions such as monogamy of Bell inequality violation [48,49] and exclusion principle of classical information transmission over quantum channels [50] (cf. [51][52][53][54]). More precisely, within the consideration of a multiparty set-up, for example, of an editor with several reporters, if the shared quantum state between the editor and a single reporter violates a Bell inequality [55,56] or is quantum dense codeable [57], then the rest of the channels shared between the editor and the other reporters are prohibited from possessing the same quantum advantage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists no-go theorems which place parallel restrictions such as monogamy of Bell inequality violation [48,49] and exclusion principle of classical information transmission over quantum channels [50] (cf. [51][52][53][54]). More precisely, within the consideration of a multiparty set-up, for example, of an editor with several reporters, if the shared quantum state between the editor and a single reporter violates a Bell inequality [55,56] or is quantum dense codeable [57], then the rest of the channels shared between the editor and the other reporters are prohibited from possessing the same quantum advantage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%