Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02248673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonverbal bases of social perception: Developmental change in sensitivity to patterns of motion that reveal interpersonal events

Abstract: This study examined the development of sensitivity to specific patterns of movement that reveal interpersonal events. Preschoolers and adults viewed an animated film created by Heider and Simmel (1944), and then answered a set of probe questions about traits, emotions, and relationships that characterized the geometric figures in the film. Five-year-olds and adults gained similiar impressions of the film, and their attributions were similar to those that have emerged in openended descriptions of the film produ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost all observers described the object movements in an anthropomorphic way, reporting a reliable impression of animacy and meaningful social interactions among the geometric shapes displayed in the decontextualized animation. Their results were replicated in other studies using similar videos for both human adults (Oatley & Yuill, ; Rimé, Boulanger, Laubin, Richir, & Stroobants, ) and preschoolers as young as 5 years old (Springer, Meier, & Berry, ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Almost all observers described the object movements in an anthropomorphic way, reporting a reliable impression of animacy and meaningful social interactions among the geometric shapes displayed in the decontextualized animation. Their results were replicated in other studies using similar videos for both human adults (Oatley & Yuill, ; Rimé, Boulanger, Laubin, Richir, & Stroobants, ) and preschoolers as young as 5 years old (Springer, Meier, & Berry, ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, it is our interpretation of other entities as having a mind that ultimately leads to a perception of animacy (Santos et al, 2008;Tremoulet and Feldman, 2006). Movement features contributing to animacy perception include self-propelled motion, such as initiation of movement without an external cause (Leslie, 1984;Stewart, 1984), motion contingency (spatial and temporal synchrony) between objects (Bassili, 1976;Blakemore et al, 2003;Johnson, 2003;Johnson et al, 2001), and responsiveness to the motion by the environment (Abell et al, 2000;Blakemore et al, 2003Blakemore et al, , 2001Castelli et al, 2000;Leslie, 1984;Michotte, 1946;Rochat et al, 1997;Santos et al, 2008;Schlottmann and Surian, 1999;Schultz et al, 2005;Springer et al, 1996;Tremoulet and Feldman, 2006). In our own study, participants experienced an increase in animacy perception whenever the animations displayed a combination of movement cues (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As Jehn (1997) pointed out, there is a mutually hazardous interplay between these two types of conflict. Interpersonal communication can be misinterpreted based on poor language choice or through nonverbal communication cues, which can display meaning, affect, status, and strategic information (Alibali, Flevares, & Goldin-Meadow, 1997;Jones & Remland, 1993;Springer, Meier, & Berry, 1996). Moreover, potentially beneficial conflict statements can have negative effects when interpersonal communication is difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%