2021
DOI: 10.1017/fms.2021.62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonvanishing for cubic L-functions

Abstract: We prove that there is a positive proportion of L-functions associated to cubic characters over $\mathbb F_q[T]$ that do not vanish at the critical point $s=1/2$ . This is achieved by computing the first mollified moment using techniques previously developed by the authors in their work on the first moment of cubic L-functions, and by obtaining a sharp upper bound for the second mollified moment, building on work of Lester and Radziwiłł, which in turn deve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In applying the upper bounds method of Soundararajan-Harper, we shall also make crucial use of an upper bound on log |L(1/2, χ D )| for D ∈ H 2g+1,q in terms of a short Dirichlet polynomial over the primes. We now derive such a bound basing on the devices developed in the proofs of [1, Theorem 3.3], [13,Proposition 4.3] and [15,Lemma 3.1]. We recall from the above that L(s, χ D ) is a polynomial of degree at most 2g for D ∈ H 2g+1,q .…”
Section: We Define the Zeta Function ζmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In applying the upper bounds method of Soundararajan-Harper, we shall also make crucial use of an upper bound on log |L(1/2, χ D )| for D ∈ H 2g+1,q in terms of a short Dirichlet polynomial over the primes. We now derive such a bound basing on the devices developed in the proofs of [1, Theorem 3.3], [13,Proposition 4.3] and [15,Lemma 3.1]. We recall from the above that L(s, χ D ) is a polynomial of degree at most 2g for D ∈ H 2g+1,q .…”
Section: We Define the Zeta Function ζmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a general Dirichlet polynomial of the form D(s) = p Y a(p)p −s , suppose t ∈ [T, 2T ] is such that |kD(s)| Z. Then by (17) we have (37) e kD(s) −…”
Section: Some Useful Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This circle of ideas has been used in a wide variety of different contexts recently. These include; short interval maxima of the Riemann zeta function [2,3,4], unconditional bounds for the moments of zeta and L-functions [21,26,27], value distribution of L-functions [16,30,39], sign changes in Fourier coefficients of modular forms [35], non-vanishing of central values of L-functions [17] and equidistribution of lattice points on the sphere [32]. In our case, we use these ideas to prove the following.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cubic Dirichlet L-functions over F q (t), David, Florea, and Lalín [DFL19] computed the mean values of the L-functions. They also proved that a positive proportion of these L-functions do not vanish at the central point [DFL20]. For twists of order r such that q ≡ 1 mod r, Meisner determined the number of F q -points of the associated curves [Mei15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%