2000
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00dc13750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nontumorous Hepatic Arterial-Portal Venous Shunts: MR Imaging Findings

Abstract: A small nontumorous arterioportal shunt should be considered one of the causes of focal parenchymal hyperperfusion abnormalities on contrast-enhanced dynamic MR images of the liver in the absence of abnormal signal intensity on static MR images.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
59
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported [8] that the combination of the higher enhancing capability of gadobenate dimeglumine and the VIBE sequence tends to maximize sensitivity in detection of enhancing hepatic lesions regardless of the presence of an arterioportal shunt or of a true hypervascular liver lesion. Therefore, in our study, the advanced cirrhotic state of the livers was associated with foci of nonmalignant hypervascularity, including nonneoplastic arterial hypervascular lesions and enhancing dysplastic or regenerative nodules, thereby accounting for the false-positive findings [32,36]. In addition in our study, the major causes of false-positive diagnoses of lesions of smaller than 1 cm on MRI were different from those for lesions 1 cm in diameter or A C Fig.…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been reported [8] that the combination of the higher enhancing capability of gadobenate dimeglumine and the VIBE sequence tends to maximize sensitivity in detection of enhancing hepatic lesions regardless of the presence of an arterioportal shunt or of a true hypervascular liver lesion. Therefore, in our study, the advanced cirrhotic state of the livers was associated with foci of nonmalignant hypervascularity, including nonneoplastic arterial hypervascular lesions and enhancing dysplastic or regenerative nodules, thereby accounting for the false-positive findings [32,36]. In addition in our study, the major causes of false-positive diagnoses of lesions of smaller than 1 cm on MRI were different from those for lesions 1 cm in diameter or A C Fig.…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Because some dysplastic nodules [27,28] and lesions of focal nodular hyperplasia [29,30] also become enhanced during the hepatic arterial phase, the presence of arterial phase enhancement is not specific for the presence of malignancy. In addition, arterial phase enhancement can be seen with hemangiomas, arterial-portal venous shunts, and aberrant venous drainage [31,32].…”
Section: Choi Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we excluded lesions that showed water-like T2W hyperintensity and sustained contrast enhancement on delayed-phase imaging compatible with typical hemangiomas (n03). In addition, to reduce selection bias in the future analysis of the imaging features, we also excluded subcapsular wedge-shaped hypervascular lesions on AP that were not distinguished from the background parenchyma on any other imaging sequences (n 033), which is suggestive of typical pseudolesions (4). Finally, a total of 74 benign lesions determined by long-term imaging follow-up (from 24 months to 60 months, mean 38.6 months) were included in the comparative group, and all of the 143 small hypervascular lesions including HCC and benign lesions were marked by electronic arrows and saved on the AP images.…”
Section: Patients and Mr Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded typical haemangiomas depending on the imaging findings: bright hyperintensity on T 2 weighted images and gradual peripheral, globular and centrifugal enhancement or the bright dot sign on dynamic enhancing MRI [12]. Typical non-tumorous arterioportal venous shunts were also excluded in the presence of the following imaging findings: a subcapsular wedge-shaped arterial enhancement area in the liver without any distinguishable abnormal signal intensity on the pre-contrast T 1 and T 2 weighted images in addition to equilibrium phase post-contrast images [13]. All of the pre-excluded lesions were verified again by no change or disappearance on follow-up imaging studies.…”
Section: Patient Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%