2012
DOI: 10.5145/kjcm.2012.15.3.98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Isolated from Respiratory Specimens during Recent Two Years: Distribution and Clinical Significance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1970, Kim et al30 identified NTM species in sputum at a rate of 2.7%. More recently, NTM isolation rates in cultured specimens have been found to be approximately 10-30%, as represented by those from Seoul Asan Hospital32 (21.9%) in 2002, Seoul National University (SNU) Hospital9 (21.5%) in 2006, Fatima Hospital33 (7.9%) in 2009, and Gil Hospital34 (19.4%) in 2012. The variation in rates reported by different hospitals may be due to variations in patient group characteristics, research periods, specimen collection and detection methods used, and NTM detection thresholds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1970, Kim et al30 identified NTM species in sputum at a rate of 2.7%. More recently, NTM isolation rates in cultured specimens have been found to be approximately 10-30%, as represented by those from Seoul Asan Hospital32 (21.9%) in 2002, Seoul National University (SNU) Hospital9 (21.5%) in 2006, Fatima Hospital33 (7.9%) in 2009, and Gil Hospital34 (19.4%) in 2012. The variation in rates reported by different hospitals may be due to variations in patient group characteristics, research periods, specimen collection and detection methods used, and NTM detection thresholds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 2000s, the frequency of NTM isolation has been reported to be 12 to 38% of mycobacterial culture-positive specimens, and the number of patients with NTM disease has also been considerable, with a frequency of 8 to 49% of isolated NTM (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). The isolation of NTM species from respiratory specimens is not sufficient evidence for the diagnosis of clinically significant NTM lung disease, since there are also clinical, radiographic, and microbiological criteria (1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,13 Our study showed a higher frequency of NTM isolation (43.9%) compared with previous studies, which reported 2-20%. 19,20 There may be several reasons for this result. First, the infection rates of NTM are increasing, 21 and patients in this study received routine sputum or respiratory specimen culture tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%