2019
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.jopa.19.00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nontraumatic First Rib Fractures Secondary to Opposing Muscle Contractions

Abstract: While first rib fractures typically occur from direct traumatic injuries and have high rates of serious complications, nontraumatic first rib fractures are less common and encountered in young athletes. The mechanism for these nontraumatic fractures is thought to be due to sudden contractions of opposing muscle forces on a developing bone. Because of the biomechanics of the first rib’s opposing muscle attachments, first rib fractures should be considered in patients who report pain deep to the medial clavicle,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our patient had no history of trauma either. In addition, non-traumatic first rib fractures have been reported in young athletes who generally participate in sports with heading or overhead arm movements; stress fractures likely to result from the opposite force of muscle contractions on the bones with ongoing maturation [5]. There are case series of non-traumatic rib fractures after coughing not only in elderly but also in young patients, all of whom demonstrated a T-score below − 2.5 [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our patient had no history of trauma either. In addition, non-traumatic first rib fractures have been reported in young athletes who generally participate in sports with heading or overhead arm movements; stress fractures likely to result from the opposite force of muscle contractions on the bones with ongoing maturation [5]. There are case series of non-traumatic rib fractures after coughing not only in elderly but also in young patients, all of whom demonstrated a T-score below − 2.5 [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%