2016
DOI: 10.1080/09639284.2016.1193034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nontraditional student withdrawal from undergraduate accounting programmes: a holistic perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean age of the study population was 25 years old. This age range is in line with the definition of non-traditional students (Chen, 2017;Ellis, 2019;Fortin et al, 2016). This connection required further exploration and a chi-square test of independence and t-test were performed to examine if there was a statistically significant relationship, with respect to age, between the number of students who passed a course with a letter grade 'C' or better when provided their required course materials on or before the first day of class, as part of an inclusive access program, compared to students who had the responsibility of sourcing their own required course material.…”
Section: Unexpected Findingssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The mean age of the study population was 25 years old. This age range is in line with the definition of non-traditional students (Chen, 2017;Ellis, 2019;Fortin et al, 2016). This connection required further exploration and a chi-square test of independence and t-test were performed to examine if there was a statistically significant relationship, with respect to age, between the number of students who passed a course with a letter grade 'C' or better when provided their required course materials on or before the first day of class, as part of an inclusive access program, compared to students who had the responsibility of sourcing their own required course material.…”
Section: Unexpected Findingssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This situation also has implications and costs in several dimensions: social, economic, and personal [36]. Research on this topic began in the 1970s and 1980s [37][38][39][40]; these approaches are still the basis for developing new solutions [41][42][43][44][45]. However, it is necessary to note that dropout can happen throughout the academic course (from the first to the second year [46], and from the second to the third year [47]).…”
Section: Dropoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adams and Becker (1990) argued that course withdrawals are problematic not only because they are costly, but more importantly because they indicate that a breakdown in the system has occurred because the student is willing to drop a course with no, or little, tuition refund. It is therefore surprising that research about the topic is both scarce and dated, unlike research that addresses retention on the college level (Craig and Ward, 2008; Davidson and Wilson, 2017; Fortin et al , 2016; Lounsbury et al , 2004; Mamiseishvili and Deggs, 2013; Schmitt and Duggan, 2011). The reason given by Adams and Becker (1990) for this state of affairs is that course withdrawal is not seen as a failure of the school or university as a whole.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the studies cited in this paper have been conducted in the USA. While dropping out of college has received cross-national interest (Fortin et al , 2016; Laing and Robinson, 2003; Smith and Naylor, 2001), the same cannot be said about course withdrawal. Accordingly, this is one of the first studies to investigate course withdrawal in another country.…”
Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%