2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonthermal emission from the reverse shock of the youngest Galactic supernova remnant G1.9+0.3

Abstract: Context. The youngest Galactic supernova remnant G1.9+0.3 is an interesting target for next generation gamma-ray observatories. So far, the remnant is only detected in the radio and the X-ray bands, but its young age of ≈ 100 yrs and inferred shock speed of ≈ 14, 000 km/s could make it an efficient particle accelerator. Aims. We aim to model the observed radio and X-ray spectra together with the morphology of the remnant. At the same time, we aim to estimate the gamma-ray flux from the source and evaluated the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As cosmic-ray ions typically carry more energy density than do the electrons, they would provide most of the amplified field, and it is questionable whether any estimate of spectral steepening can be directly applied to electrons and hence to radio synchrotron spectra. Besides, the youngest known SNR in the Galaxy, G1.9+0.3, has a very fast forward shock (Reynolds et al 2008), but the radio emission most likely comes from the reverse shock whose speed is considerably lower (Brose et al 2019).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As cosmic-ray ions typically carry more energy density than do the electrons, they would provide most of the amplified field, and it is questionable whether any estimate of spectral steepening can be directly applied to electrons and hence to radio synchrotron spectra. Besides, the youngest known SNR in the Galaxy, G1.9+0.3, has a very fast forward shock (Reynolds et al 2008), but the radio emission most likely comes from the reverse shock whose speed is considerably lower (Brose et al 2019).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We solve the transport equation for protons in 1D using the RATPaC code as described in [2,[28][29][30] taking into account only a forward shock and ignoring the reverse shock. Resulting proton spectra at different epochs are then used to calculate the Pion-decay emission from the remnant.…”
Section: Robert Brosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of the circumstellar magnetic field on the gamma-ray emission from SNRs Iurii Sushch R, pc We solve the transport equation for electrons in 1D using the RATPaC code as described in [2,3,4,5] taking into account only a forward shock and ignoring a reverse shock. Resulting electron spectra at different moments of time are then used to simulate inverse Compton emission from the remnant.…”
Section: Pos(icrc2019)1179mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario synchrotron losses might cause a cooling break in the spectrum appearing at quite low GeV energies resembling a characteristic pion-decay feature. In this work we aim to study such a possibility through the simulation of the SNR evolution and particle acceleration in the circumstellar environment of the stellar wind bubble of the progenitor star using the RATPaC (Radiation Acceleration Transport Parallel Code) code [2,3,4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%