Nonsynonymous, synonymous and nonsense mutations in human cancer-related genes undergo stronger purifying selections than expectation

Abstract

Background Nonsynonymous mutations change the protein sequences and are frequently subjected to natural selection. The same goes for nonsense mutations that introduce pre-mature stop codons into CDSs (coding sequences). Synonymous mutations, however, are intuitively thought to be functionally silent and evolutionarily neutral. Now researchers know that the optimized synonymous codon usage is advantageous in the speedy mRNA translation process. With the advent of NGS technique, the explosion of NGS data generated from the tumor tissues help researchers identify driver mutations in cancer-related genes, but relatively less attention is paid to the SNP data in healthy human populations when studying cancer. Methods Here, we analyzed the publically available human SNPs. We classified these SNPs according to their functional and evolutionary categories. By simply dividing the human genes into cancer-related genes and other genes, we compared the features of nonsynonymous, synonymous and nonsense mutations in these two gene sets from multiple aspects. Results We provided lines of evidence that the nonsynonymous, synonymous and nonsense mutations in cancer-related genes undergo stronger purifying selection when compared to the expected pattern in other genes. The lower nonsynonymous to synonymous ratio observed in cancer-related genes suggests the suppression of amino acid substitutions in these genes. The synonymous SNPs, after excluding those in splicing regions, exhibit preferred changes in codon usage and higher codon frequencies in cancer-related genes compared to other genes, indicating the constraint exerted on these mutations. Nonsense mutations are less frequent and located closer to stop codons in cancer-related genes than in other genes, which putatively minimize their deleterious effects. Conclusion Our study demonstrated the evolutionary constraint on mutations in CDS of cancer-related genes without the requirement of data from cancer tissues or patients. Our work provides novel perspectives on interpreting the constraint on mutations in cancer-related genes. We reveal extra constraint on synonymous mutations in cancer-related genes which is related to codon usage bias and is in addition to the splicing effect. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5572-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparative Analysis of the Transcriptome and Distribution of Putative SNPs in Two Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Breeding Strains by Using Next-Generation Sequencing

“…Synonymous SNPs do not directly lead to a change in the structure of the encoded protein and thus to putative changes in its functionality or effectiveness, but they can also have a significant impact [62]. It is commonly agreed that ongoing selection acting on genes involves both, synonymous and non-synonymous mutations [60,63,64].…”

Dimensionality and Structure in Cancer Genomics: A Statistical Learning Perspective

“…In the above a key caveat requiring understanding is the role of selective pressure in cancer-relevant genes [25], and how this affects the mutation rate in different sections of the genome [26]. One way this can be investigated is by looking at the relative predictive power of synonymous and non-synonymous mutations for genome-wide mutation burden [27]. The gold standard for identifying causative relationships between genotype and phenotype, however, remains with functional validation studies.…”

Genome-wide analysis on the maize genome reveals weak selection on synonymous mutations

“…As understood by the broad researchers, synonymous mutations do not change the amino acid (AA) sequences. However, they are still subjected to natural selection [1][2][3]. For instance, a few synonymous mutations occurring in the proper place could affect mRNA splicing [4,5].…”